RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2006, 12:01 PM   #1
nkufan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Starters ERA?

Just wondering if anyone knows what the starters combined era is this season?
nkufan is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 04-15-2006, 12:02 PM   #2
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Starters ERA?

4.25
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 12:05 PM   #3
nkufan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Re: Starters ERA?

thanks m2 thats bad and if i recall the bullpen has let a few inherted runners score too
nkufan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 12:11 PM   #4
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,459
Re: Starters ERA?

That's actually very good for us. Now if the bullpen can do anything decent we may be able to surprise some people.
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 12:16 PM   #5
nkufan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Re: Starters ERA?

my fault guys i forgot to put the not im my reply i think is great for the reds. It is prolly in the middle 3s without opening day
nkufan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 12:51 PM   #6
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,246
Re: Starters ERA?

M2 is overstating it a bit! The REDS starter's ERA is 3.77 after 10 games.
* 62 IP, 26 ER, 60 H, 47 K, 10 BB, 8 HRA. 1.13 WHIP.

Bullpen
* 27 IP, 19 ER, 34 H, 24 K, 14 BB. 6.33 ERA, 1.78 WHIP.

4.55 Team ERA.

Without Opening Day, the starters are:
* 57 IP, 20 ER, 3.16 ERA, 1.02 WHIP.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

Last edited by RedFanAlways1966; 04-15-2006 at 12:54 PM.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 12:57 PM   #7
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
Re: Starters ERA?

That 4.7:1 strikeout to walk ratio (and corresponding 1.13 WHIP) is the most promising thing I see. The homers don't hurt nearly as much when you aren't putting people on base for free. I must say I was very pessimistic about our chances last night and was pleasantly surprised.

It seems like Narron is increasingly using Coffey in high leverage situations, setting him up to take over the closers role down the road. Of course, he's going to need to maintain his K rate if he's going to close. Last year's abysmal K rate will not get it done.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 01:06 PM   #8
nkufan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Re: Starters ERA?

If are team era stay between 4.25 and 4.50 we hang around all season. I have confidence in weathers, coffey, and mercker. We need two more people to step and the other 2 can be long relief. I know I am stating the obvious bet if the starters keep going 6 or 7 innings the backend bullpen are all that really matter.
nkufan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 03:47 PM   #9
cincyinco
We are the angry mob
 
cincyinco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The 303
Posts: 2,479
Re: Starters ERA?

Dave Williams brings the starters ERA up a notch... sigh.
__________________
"I hate to advocate chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone... But they've always worked for me."

-Hunter S. Thompson
cincyinco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 05:21 PM   #10
UPRedsFan
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 818
Re: Starters ERA?

4.43 after 11 games now.
UPRedsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 05:23 PM   #11
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: Starters ERA?

Even is bad as Williams was and is likely to remain the starting pitching is a ways down the list of problems that needs to be addressed.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 07:15 PM   #12
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Starters ERA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyer85
Even is bad as Williams was and is likely to remain the starting pitching is a ways down the list of problems that needs to be addressed.
It remains #1 for me. The team can improve the defense simply by deploying players already in the fold. And I'm not one who thinks it makes sense for a team like the Reds to make high profile bullpen moves. What the team needs to do on that front is start collecting arms. In the meantime, acquiring more starting talent remains critical. Whether it's biding time to get into the Dontrelle Willis market or snatching up a prospect from a franchise that needs a major league bat today (hello L.A., Houston and Minnesota), I recommend monomania.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 07:17 PM   #13
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Starters ERA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2
It remains #1 for me. The team can improve the defense simply by deploying players already in the fold. And I'm not one who thinks it makes sense for a team like the Reds to make high profile bullpen moves. What the team needs to do on that front is start collecting arms. In the meantime, acquiring more starting talent remains critical. Whether it's biding time to get into the Dontrelle Willis market or snatching up a prospect from a franchise that needs a major league bat today (hello L.A., Houston and Minnesota), I recommend monomania.
Moi aussi.

Improve the starters--and by virtue of that you improve the bullpen, the defense.....
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 07:29 PM   #14
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
Re: Starters ERA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2
And I'm not one who thinks it makes sense for a team like the Reds to make high profile bullpen moves.
Starting pitchng solves lots of bullpen problems -- when your starters go 7 a night, you can rotate 2-3 guys in setup and have 1 guy closing games out. I think the Reds could manage a decent bullpen of some combination of Weathers, Mercker, Coffey and Shackleford that would win them a lot of ballgames if it was coupled with 5 starters that could throw 7 innings of competitive ball per night.

It's when you get outings like today from your starting pitching that your bullpen gets exposed. Improve the starting pitching and that ceases to be a problem.

Plus, it wouldn't hurt the Reds to play a little prospect shuffling -- move some trash starting pieces like Germano and Ramirez and acquire some AA arms in return. Move guys that the team DOESN'T project as starters but who are still starting (and, thus overvalued) and exchange them for more advanced bullpen-type pitchers.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 08:19 PM   #15
2001MUgrad
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SE Of the NC Blue Ridge Mtns.
Posts: 1,462
Re: Starters ERA?

The Reds starters have a new and fresh look from game to game so far this year. They seem to be able to keep hitters off balance. The biggest knock on them is that they continue to give up a ton of homers. As long as no one is on base its not that big of a problem. It would be great if they could add a true power pitcher to the starting rotation, actually to the pitching staff in general. I really like how Arroyo and Harang look when they are on. Both of those guys just need to be careful and either keep the ball low or if sneaking a high ball in there make sure its HIGH!

Overall 4 of the 5 have looked pretty good so far. You have to be pleased with the progress thus far of Claussen and as long as the Milton of the first half of the season last year stays away it could be a good year.
2001MUgrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25