![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Camden, NC
Posts: 56
|
Time for Coffey as closer
I was impressed with Coffey Friday and today!! To me he showed great poise under pressure, especially against a team like the Cardinals. Weathers is a good pitcher, but not as a closer, I would have prefered to see a duel of Pujols vs. Coffey myself. Many more endings like these and I don't think it will be long before we see him in there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
might happen but only because he is best among a choice of bad options. The Reds pen is a group of pitchers who on the best day are middle relievers.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand Last edited by flyer85; 04-16-2006 at 06:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Greatness In The Making
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,078
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Well I think he could be giving that chance... soon I hope. This team isn't going to go anywhere if they stick with a suspect bullpen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 808
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Why not give him the role.........maybe he turns out like Turnbow of the Brewers.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SE Of the NC Blue Ridge Mtns.
Posts: 1,462
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
I have been sort of impressed with Coffey this year, but I wasn't today. His butchering of the bottom of the Cards lineup in the 8th led to Pujols batting in the 9th.
If the Reds are going to contend or hang around .500 they do need a solid closer, but up until today Weathers had great numbers especiall OBA. Let's not forget that Coffey's first 3 batters all reached base. I think the closer position is one of the more over rated positions, but it has been proven that its tough to be a contender unless you have a solid one. The closer by committee thing just hasn't worked for anyone in the past really.
__________________
I'm East of you. Be very very worried. Not quite OBX. But, be worried. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,914
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Coffey as closer doesn't really improve our chance to win very much -- but it certainly makes him much more expensive down the road when he goes in to arb....
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cambridge, OH
Posts: 16,273
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Quote:
Rawly Eastwick: 58 games, 90 IP, 5-3 record, 2.60 ERA, 22 saves, 61 Ks, 25 BBs Will McEnaney: 70 games, 91 IP, 5-2 record, 2.47 ERA, 15 saves, 48 Ks, 23 BBs Clay Carroll: 56 games, 96.1 IP, 7-5 record, 2.62 ERA, 7 saves, 44 Ks, 32 BBs Pedro Borbon: 67 games, 125 IP, 9-5 record, 2.95 ERA, 5 saves, 29 Ks, 21 BBs
__________________
Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser....Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed...the very idea of losing is hateful to an American. Gen. George S. Patton, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
got alil captain in u?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bridgeport Ohio
Posts: 4,839
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
it's time jerry needs to hvae them in set roles
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,812
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
It's time for Castellini to hire Monty Hall and make a deal for some pen help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Quote:
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SE Of the NC Blue Ridge Mtns.
Posts: 1,462
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Quote:
__________________
I'm East of you. Be very very worried. Not quite OBX. But, be worried. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,656
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
I honestly don't think Weathers is the problem.
Look what Pujols did to Lidge last year, he is going to do that to people. We need to surround Coffey, Weathers, and maybe even Kent with some better arms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,886
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
You could see this coming a mile away. The time to come up with a respectable closer was in January, not April. The failure of this organization to resolve this problem over the winter was probably due to its typical cheapness and we will pay the price for the rest of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 3,440
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
Quote:
__________________
And This One Belongs to the REDS!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cookeville, Tennessee
Posts: 334
|
Re: Time for Coffey as closer
I just don't think that there is a pitcher on the reds staff that is ready to be a closer. Coffey is as close as your going to get but I don't think he is ready. I think that if the reds had a legitimate closer this could be a good pen, with Weathers,Merker, and Coffey as setup men.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |