![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 206
|
Bengals Draft
Looks like biggest need is a starting tight end. But probably will take best player available, likely defense. Is anyone hearing anything different?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Has anyone seen any interesting mock drafts?
Any hints where Marvin is leaning for our picks? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Latin Heartthrob
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 625
|
Re: Bengals Draft
No need to get a TE in the first round with how ridiculously deep the TE pool is in this year's draft. They could get a very quality TE in the third round. I think they need to address defensive line and secondary in the first two rounds... a pass-rushing monster end would help, and someone to push Tory James at CB (I don't think Ratliff is the long-term answer, personally.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: Bengals Draft
My personal perference is DE/LB Manny Lawson from NC State. Marvin mentioned possibly going to the 3-4 defense. Lawson and Pollack would form a nice pair of OLB's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,459
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Lawson or Cromartie
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
These players would make my draft. Antonio Cromartie Jason Allen Donte Whitner Thomas Howard. If we get one of those four in the first round, im very happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Latin Heartthrob
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 625
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
That said, I am in agreement on those secondary picks you listed. Jason Allen is who I most coveted in my mock Bengals draft where I picked out the eight guys I wanted to see them get. I would like Kiwanuka if he's availble because I really believe a pass rusher is a strong need, but would be thrilled with Allen or Cromartie. Ashton Youboty is another I've had my eye on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: Bengals Draft
I'm hearing a lot of talk that the Bengals could be looking at tackle in the one of the first two rounds because with the contracts for Levi and Big Willie up at the end of 2006 and health concerns regarding both.
Personally I hope they move down and grab an extra third like Denver did if an obivious choice is not at 24. This draft is deep with talent in the second and third rounds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Potential Lunch Winner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
|
Re: Bengals Draft
I hope they take the best player available. I can't stand when teams leave someone big on the board because they think they can't use them. They end up taking a guy who would have went #28 at #17 just because they need a tackle.
I'll never, ever forgive the Bengals for taking Big Daddy over Marshall Faulk. Never.
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 87
|
Re: Bengals Draft
If the mid/late 90s Benglas had Faulk, I'm not sure it would have made much of a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Davey
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dayton
Posts: 911
|
Re: Bengals Draft
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |