![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,811
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Why all the love for Ross? I think this Cody Ross situation is almost as crazy as the Deno situation. What makes Ross any better than Denorfia? Kriv seems to be putting the team in this situation a lot so far (picking up these guys with no options left) and I hope he doesn't shoot himself in the foot in the future where he has to drop someone of value. Phillips worked out great and DRoss is kind of clogging up the roster since Kriv doesn't want to drop any catchers. Kriv has been lucky since there has been a lot of dead weight on the roster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 3,440
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
I hope to see Cody back. Can he do a rehab stent? Everyday I log on to Redzone I expect to see some kind of trade with one of our catchers, Cody, or someone, but it hasn't happended. We might be stuck with the pen we currently have. Hopefully merk is healhty.
__________________
And This One Belongs to the REDS!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
But then again in his defense, is there really anything on the 40 man outside maybe the top 12-15 guys that it would really hurt if we lost them? To paraphrase the great Branch Rickey "We sucked with them, we can suck without them."
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,824
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
I wonder what the Reds will do with Ross. If they bring him up, which is necessary to keep him, McCracken seems like the odd man out. But Q can hit lefty (only Valentin on bench hits lefty) and can play centerfield (don't think Ross can).
I'm sure most people would rather keep Ross, as would I, since he has more upside. But with 12 pitchers and 3 catchers, team has room for only 3 non-catcher bench guys. Freel, Aurilia and who? Does Ross -- who only plays LF or RF -- provide enough flexibility for that spot? Do the Reds need a lefthanded bat (Ross hits righty) in that spot? I'm interested to see how Krivsky handles this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
Ross can play CF, certainly as well as the ball dropping QM.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redsland
Posts: 828
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
It's simple really:
Ross>Mcracken He's younger and better, and actauly has a bit of an upside. Don't keep someone inferior because he tries to bat left-handed.
__________________
Weathers' W/L when I am attending (2009): 0-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,824
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cambridge, OH
Posts: 16,272
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
I think you can keep both C.Ross and McCracken. In my opinion, the best move is to send down a pitcher to make room for C. Ross:
1) Activate OF Cody Ross. Option RHP Mike Burns. 2) Activate LHP Kent Mercker. Option LHP Brian Shackelford or DFA RHP Rick White. This leaves the club with 11 pitchers, which is plenty.
__________________
Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser....Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed...the very idea of losing is hateful to an American. Gen. George S. Patton, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,408
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
From Marc's blog:
Ross in, Burns out Cody Ross' eternal rehab assignment is over. He was activated from the DL today and Mike Burns was optioned back to Louisville. Guess it is a bit intriguing that they're going down to 11 pitchers, but that might only last a couple of days, pending Mercker's expected return Friday. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 272
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,824
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Gold star for Big Klu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redsland
Posts: 828
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
__________________
Weathers' W/L when I am attending (2009): 0-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,824
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
I hope they keep Shack. I think his bad ERA is the result of one or two terrible outings in a mop up role. I don't know the stats but he seems to do well against lefties and is good for that limited role.
I also think White should be the odd man out. Hammond is pitching much better and can be used more often in meaningful spots. Belisle, occasionally, too. Of course, Reds may reverse course, add Mercker as 12th pitcher, and drop a position player. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Cody Ross back Wednesday?
Quote:
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |