RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2006, 01:35 PM   #16
Red Heeler
Member
 
Red Heeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 1,656
Re: Infield defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by princeton
Phillips isn't the type of player for whom you move other players. Phillips has to go where there's an open spot and hope that he doesn't screw it up.

Lopez is a player that gets to play where he wants, until the day that he gets dealt.
I agree with you that the time to change Felipe's position has come and gone. I'll enjoy his production as long as he is around, but I wouldn't look to break the bank to keep him. I would be trolling around for a team whose window is around now-ish with a stud SS in the making at AA or above.
Red Heeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 05-30-2006, 02:06 PM   #17
TeamBoone
"Let's Roll"
 
TeamBoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 12,828
Re: Infield defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by princeton
Lopez is a player that gets to play where he wants, until the day that he gets dealt.
Hmmmm, but Dunn isn't? Just curious why that is as he's made many more errors than Dunn (granted, SS is harder than LF).
__________________
"Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn
TeamBoone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 02:31 PM   #18
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
Re: Infield defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Heeler
I agree with you that the time to change Felipe's position has come and gone. I'll enjoy his production as long as he is around, but I wouldn't look to break the bank to keep him. I would be trolling around for a team whose window is around now-ish with a stud SS in the making at AA or above.
Lopez is already gone considering who his agent is, if the Reds fall out of it the time to deal him would be this year.
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 03:41 PM   #19
princeton
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: princeton, nj
Posts: 9,482
Re: Infield defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamBoone
Hmmmm, but Dunn isn't?
hmm, but Dunn is. You'll notice that he's playing where he likes.
princeton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 08:34 PM   #20
Red Heeler
Member
 
Red Heeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 1,656
Re: Infield defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by KronoRed
Lopez is already gone considering who his agent is, if the Reds fall out of it the time to deal him would be this year.
If the Reds fall and Arizona stays in the hunt, Kriv should be on the phone with the Josh Byrnes daily. Lopez for Steven Drew and Scott Hairston.
Red Heeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 09:51 AM   #21
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: Infield defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrooklynRedz
If the Reds are going to consider moving Lopez to 2B, I'd rather see them look to move him. The market is going to be much greater for a good-hitting SS (albeit one with defensive shortcomings) than it will be for a good-hitting 2B. Perhaps my logic is all wrong on this one, but I'm of the opinion that Lopez would net us a really good package (including starting pitching help). If you swap him to 2b, you'll see that return diminish (if not disappear) and face further hurdles with the price he seeks in free agency.

I couldn't have said it any better.

With Lopez having Scott Boras as an agent, I'm concerned about Lopez signing long term in the Queen City. I also think that Boras would convince Lopez to resist a move to 2B, as it would diminish his market value.

That being said, while I would love to see Lopez on a LTC playing 2B, or maybe even 3B for the Reds, I think this might be a case where his perceived value might net us the pitching we need to compete and establish our franchise for 2007 and beyond.

I think Lopez offers a lot to the Reds in terms of offensive value, but until we move Lopez to 2B or 3B, he's a defensive liability due to lack of range and that less than accurate arm.
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25