RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2006, 04:05 PM   #31
Aronchis
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVRed
Baseball America called the Reds last year on Jay Bruce.
Because the draft fell as expected, it may not this year.
Aronchis is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 06-05-2006, 04:21 PM   #32
Red Heeler
Member
 
Red Heeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 1,656
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt
Drabek is apparently good enough with the bat that if he werent so good on the mound, he would be the best positional player in the high school crop. Problme is, he is just that much better on the mound. Even with how "deep" this years college pitching is, Drabek is the guy I would like to see if Miller and Hochevar are not available.
IF, and only IF, Drabek is a greater talent than all of the college pitchers available would I consider drafting him as a pitcher. Frankly, I really can't get a good idea based on the various scouting reports. All of them seem to say, "Well, he's really good, but he's got these boogemen in the closet that we can't tell you about." They don't really give a good comparison to him versus the rest of the field.

If he is considered a true stud SS prospect, I might consider taking him with the intent of leaving him at SS. I'm a big fan of very high quality SS play. I suppose it has something to do with #11 being around when I really started to learn the game.

I would not, under any circumstances, draft Drabek with the idea that if he fails as a pitcher, you can always convert him. Rick Ankiel was supposed to be a great OF prospect, just a better pitching prospect. We've seen how the move back out on the field worked for him.
Red Heeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 04:22 PM   #33
Outshined_One
One Man Army
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 440
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by edabbs44
Agreed, but I couldn't believe they had him at 13.
Ahhhh...I misread your post. I believe they had the Cubs take him because the Cubs have had a thing for guys in HS who ooze tools...no matter their production. They tend to become enamored with power, as seen with guys like Brian Dopirak and Ryan Harvey. They also like guys who are really athletic, although not always.

They have a new scouting director in Tim Wilken, so we'll see what route he takes. As a Cubs fan (*ducks*), I'm hoping he goes for Snider. The Cubs have a ton of position prospects in their system who strike out a ton as it is. Adding a guy like Marrero, Stubbs, Conger, or Rowell (whose height worries me in terms of his ability to hit inside pitches) would not do much to help that image.
Outshined_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 04:28 PM   #34
rdiersin
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,192
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outshined_One
As a Cubs fan
AAHhhhhhhh

rdiersin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 04:33 PM   #35
Outshined_One
One Man Army
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 440
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdiersin
AAHhhhhhhh

Outshined_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 04:56 PM   #36
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,776
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Heeler
IF, and only IF, Drabek is a greater talent than all of the college pitchers available would I consider drafting him as a pitcher. Frankly, I really can't get a good idea based on the various scouting reports. All of them seem to say, "Well, he's really good, but he's got these boogemen in the closet that we can't tell you about." They don't really give a good comparison to him versus the rest of the field.

If he is considered a true stud SS prospect, I might consider taking him with the intent of leaving him at SS. I'm a big fan of very high quality SS play. I suppose it has something to do with #11 being around when I really started to learn the game.

I would not, under any circumstances, draft Drabek with the idea that if he fails as a pitcher, you can always convert him. Rick Ankiel was supposed to be a great OF prospect, just a better pitching prospect. We've seen how the move back out on the field worked for him.
His "boogeyman in the closet" was he was emotional on the mound, had a bad car wreck that no one has said involved or did not involve alcohol and he USED to have a big party problem, but apparently that hasnt been a problem since his junior year.
As for Ankiel, his talent was never in question it was just all in his head. The Reds wont take Drabek, but I know I would like them to.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 05:15 PM   #37
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,135
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by lollipopcurve
I'm in the minority in that I see the value of Stubbs. Apparently, he is a lock to be a plus defender in CF -- and since he's from a big-time college program he could probably step into GAB very soon and provide that defensive upgrade. Then you get the nice offensive tools all around (power and speed).
My only issue with Stubbs is that, just projecting down the line, if he, Drabek, and Linecum all develop into the calibur of big leaguers they're capable of becoming, then Drabek and Linecum are both going to be worth two Stubbs.

Pitching is the currency by which baseball is played. A surplus of good pitching can bring you an embarassment of riches if you play your cards right.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 05:17 PM   #38
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,826
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt
His "boogeyman in the closet" was he was emotional on the mound, had a bad car wreck that no one has said involved or did not involve alcohol and he USED to have a big party problem, but apparently that hasnt been a problem since his junior year.
As for Ankiel, his talent was never in question it was just all in his head. The Reds wont take Drabek, but I know I would like them to.
There are also the steroid rumors which probably outweigh the other concerns.
edabbs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 05:27 PM   #39
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,776
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by edabbs44
There are also the steroid rumors which probably outweigh the other concerns.
The steroid rumors, in my opinion are just due to him being a big strong dominating sports athlete, with a frustration problem at times.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 11:18 PM   #40
Willy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 441
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Drabek is suppose to be a big head case, with some character issues.
Willy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 11:27 PM   #41
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,585
Re: BA updated mock top 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVRed
Baseball America called the Reds last year on Jay Bruce.
I am well of that, just thinking that with a different regime, and an ambiguous write up, that they aren't really sure.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 02:35 AM   #42
Topcat
Member
 
Topcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,928
Re: BA updated mock top 15

I want Lincecum for the Red's his arm sounds like a young Kevin Browns thus he won't go down in flames and he has a damn decent upside.
__________________
2006 Redzone mock Draftee's- 1(st) Daniel Bard(redsox), 1(st sup)( Jordan Walden (Angels), 2(nd) rd.- Zach Britton(Orioles), 3(rd) Blair Erickson(Cardinals), 3(rd) Tim Norton( Yankees),(cuz its a Tim Hortons thing

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
Topcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 07:29 AM   #43
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,662
Re: BA updated mock top 15

I still want the Reds to draft one of the highly rated college pitchers. Stubbs...I really don't know how I would feel if the Reds drafted him. He wouldn't be a total waste of a pick, IMO, but I still prefer a college pitcher. Stubbs could develop into a Mike Cameron(gold glove center fielder, good power, takes his share of walks, and strikesout a lot), which would make him a great player, or he could be the next B.J. Szymanski. We'll see how it plays out.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 07:38 AM   #44
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,826
Re: BA updated mock top 15

I wouldn;t be that happy with Stubbs. I've got a new crush on Max.
edabbs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 07:47 AM   #45
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,826
Re: BA updated mock top 15

This morning's update still has Stubbs to Cincy. They also have the Cards getting Max at 30 and Kennedy at 42.
edabbs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25