![]() |
|
|
#16 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
Quote:
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,498
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
Quote:
__________________
"The trouble with trouble...it usually starts out as fun." - anonymous |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,467
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
Quote:
(After all, he was looking for a home in the midwest, and with Casey/Boone/Graves off the payroll, there woulda been plenty of jack to ink Rolen longterm.) Had he walked at the end of the season, there woulda been 2 comp picks in the subsequent draft. And if he signed with St. Loo after finishing the season in Cincy, the comp picks would have come at the Cards expense. It was win win. As it turns out, Rolen went to St. Loo, and the Reds got stuck with guys who were overpaid for their on the field performance. That's lose lose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
GO XAVIER!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: overland park, kansas
Posts: 1,629
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
i thought the rolen and colon trades were done by bowden but ownership nixed them?
__________________
there's nothing like bowling a 300 game! 13 now and retired. ![]() Ricky henderson has a higher OBP than C. patterson and he's retired. C. Trent 6-14-2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
Quote:
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,498
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"The trouble with trouble...it usually starts out as fun." - anonymous |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,988
|
Re: In retrospect, would you do a Ryan for a Guzman again??
When you consider that the Cards got him for Polanco, Timlin, and Bud Smith, you have to believe the Reds could (and did) make the better offer. It was about money, pure and simple.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |