![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,655
|
Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
In the spirit of every other would you post that has appeared on this board during these idle days, would you trade Austin Kearns straight up for Cole Hamels?
Two months ago, Hamels seemed like the biggest stud since Doc Gooden. After a few shaky outings and a few concerning injuries, he could be looking more like the next Zack Greinke/Todd Van Poppel. If he hits, you have another potential Liriano type on your hands, if he misses you have yet another Ryan Wagner to get rid of. The good news is he makes the league minimum, the bad news is...well, you know. Would you roll the dice on a deal like this if you're the Kriv?
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Not Laughing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 661
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Nah...he only pitched well against us becuase he is a LHP and was making his MLB debut.
The recipie for a W. Other than that game, not too impressive.
__________________
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much. ~Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Nope. Too injury prone to count on. You shouldn't just give away RF's with good defensive skills, decent arms, and decent/good pop in their bat.
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,347
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Milton for Hamels?
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,947
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
AK for Hamels? In a second. Hamels might be injury prone, but AK is no Ripken. He is also a young, potential ace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,730
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Hamels smells a lot like LH version of Mark Prior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,589
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,890
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Hamels is absolutely filthy. The only problem he is currently having is some inconsistent control, but he is bound to be among the top two or three lefties in baseball very soon. No way the Phillies would ever do this deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,678
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,835
|
Re: Purely hypothetical- Cole Hamels?
Of course you make that deal.
Of course the Phillies don't. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |