![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Smells Like Teen Spirit
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,487
|
Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
The Reds 2nd round pick was mentioned in Kevin Goldstein's Future Shock column this morning (he formerly of Baseball America)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,144
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Didn't Wood start out like this last year as well?
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 49
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Doug Bair is obviously doing one hell of a job as pitching coach up there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,663
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Watson as a starter? A month ago, I would have thought this was an insane idea. But so far, so good. Perhaps we didn't fare as bad in the draft as first thought.
__________________
Opinions are like belly buttons. Everybody has one, and they don't want someone else's shoved into their face. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Watson may be the Reds only chance for the 2006 draft, sorta like Bailey is for the 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,266
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Quote:
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Roster glue
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Covington
Posts: 520
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
I just finished reading this and stopped in to see if anyone had posted it...does anyone know what it is about Watson that made the Reds brass believe he could make the conversion? I'd really like to see the scouting report stating a collegiate closer's projection as a starter...maybe they are trying to make his arm strength optimal so the conversion is an option down the road?
A bold move by the front office, considering the likelihood that many of the staffers will be turned over as WK brings his own guys in. Maybe it is only because Watson has experienced early success, but my opinion is that no small number of fans would have been running for their pitchforks, spades, and torches just 3 short years ago if Ryan Wagner had been experimented with in this fashion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,266
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Quote:
Here's some more Watson info: http://www.redszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47641 One of the thoughts about drafting relievers and converting them is that their arms haven't been "abused" the way a college starters may have been. I don't really grasp the logic of this as most college starters only go once every seven days, but... Anyway, hopefully the Watson experiment works well.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,344
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,036
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
That unusal changeup is his knuckleball
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 9,003
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 441
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
My personal opinion on why the Reds are giving him a shot at starting.
1. He has two plus pitches(fastball and curve) and one potential above average pitch(Change). This would project him as a major league starter. 2. Has a body of a workhorse. 6' 1"- 6'3" depending on who you ask, 210 pounds, thick legs. He has the body to log 200 plus innings year after year. 3. Not positive on this, but I bet he has a pretty smooth delivery. That is the reason why Wagner could never be a starter. I bet his delivery also makes the Reds feel comfortable about him increasing his pitch count. Just my thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 530
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
lets hope soto improves his changeup. he will need that pitch to be a starter in the bigs, imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,344
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Charlie Brown All-Star
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mt. Juliet, TN
Posts: 4,681
|
Re: Sean Watson mention in Baseball Prospectus this morning
My guess is that college baseball is so different an environment from pro ball that the Reds' scouting department really doesn't care how a guy's college manager chose to use him. They're looking for the building blocks of a starting pitcher -- size, durable body, multiple pitches, etc. -- and if they find it, they trust their ability to develop it.
__________________
"I don't have a baseball team, I have a theological seminary." -- Charlie Brown |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |