RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2006, 05:16 PM   #1
Gallen5862
Moderator
 
Gallen5862's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wilmington,NC
Posts: 5,323
Reds 2007 Draft position.

The Reds will either pick 15th or 16th. The Reds 80-82 record tied with the Texas Rangers. Does anyone know how the tie is broken? This could be huge because the top half of the draft would not have to give up a first round pick for a type A free agent.

Last edited by Gallen5862; 10-02-2006 at 06:22 PM.
Gallen5862 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 10-02-2006, 05:30 PM   #2
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,480
Re: Reds 2007 Draft position.

My guess is that both teams will qualify for the top tier, meaning neither would forfeit a pick. No way they force one team, but not the other, to sacrifice their top draft choice based on a coin flip.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 10:01 PM   #3
New Fever
Member
 
New Fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis
Posts: 754
Re: Reds 2007 Draft position.

Reds get 15th pick because they had a worse record than the Rangers in 2005.
New Fever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 06:31 PM   #4
jmcclain19
Smells Like Teen Spirit
 
jmcclain19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,486
Re: Reds 2007 Draft position.

From MLB.com

Quote:
The Reds' 80-82 record this season put the club in the bottom 15 among Major League teams. It means they would not lose their 2007 first-round draft pick as compensation if they signed a Type-A free agent (a top-level free agent) during the offseason. Instead, a second-round pick would be sent to a team as compensation for signing one of its star free agents.

Cincinnati's 2006 record was identical to the Rangers, but the tiebreaker favored the Reds because Texas had more wins in 2005 (79 to 73).

The compensation rules are subject to change, however, once the collective bargaining agreement expires in December and a new agreement is reached.
jmcclain19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 10:18 PM   #5
Gallen5862
Moderator
 
Gallen5862's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wilmington,NC
Posts: 5,323
Re: Reds 2007 Draft position.

Thanks for the info. The Reds should still get a pretty good player with the 15th pick.
Gallen5862 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25