![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,655
|
Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.d...310020031/1071
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Go figure the article doesnt mention how lazy he is and we have zero responses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
they missed him sleeping between innings and crawling out to his position
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Danger is my business!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Back in Florida
Posts: 7,844
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Dunn had a bad year. It happens.
Bench had several bad years (1971, 1976). Perez and Concepcion, also. Even Ted Williams had bad years (although I'd take one of those anyday) He gets a pass from me till April.
__________________
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it." http://dalmady.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Dunn didn't accomplish what was hoped/expected for him. I still want him on the team next season unless you get something better than Dunn by trading him.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,452
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
I am from Missouri so Dunn has to show me that he is not lazy. Adam pick up your glove/bat in the off season, lose 30 lbs, cut down on your swing and I will believe the content of this article.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
What Me Worry?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Quote:
I know of Kearns and Pena (even though they have never put up the consistent numbers of a Dunn), but who is the 3rd? Lopez? That's a stretch IMO. Actually folks, I had it figured out a long time ago. The only reason Dunn hits Hrs is so he can take his time running around the bases.
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations Last edited by GAC; 10-03-2006 at 08:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
1st pick 2022 B.B. draft
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ky
Posts: 5,851
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Poor Dunn....bless his heart
__________________
We got this...its our year.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
I have often wondered why Dunn wants to play in Cincinnati. I will admit I was kind of suprised when he signed the new deal at the start of the year. I'm sure he hears 700 and reads the papers I dont know why he wants to be here. Anyone think he would get it this bad no matter where he played?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Quote:
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Yes. The city and fans of Cincinnati hardly have a monopoly on complaining about our players.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
I know I just feel like Dunn takes way more than his fair share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playoffs
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
I think most A's fans wouldn't have any problem with Dunn, and in my experience all the A's fans that I know salivate over him and wish he was in in an Oakland uniform.
Giants fans know how valuable Bonds and all his walks have been so I tend to think they'd understand and appreciate Dunn's game with his walks and on-base percentage. This is somewhat of an educated guess, but I think he'd be more popular in San Diego than most other places too. Boston would be an interesting city, for sure. They have a cult following over at SOSH, and most of the posters over at SOSH have a very strong understanding of how runs are produced. Most of them seem to like Wily Mo because they understand Wily Mo's power and age while also not caring too much about his strikeouts. Philadelphia would probably be the place where Dunn would be hated the most. Dunn would probably top Abreu and Burrell on the Phillies Phans Hate List, and that'd be an impressive accomplishment.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012 Put an end to the Lost Decade. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,808
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Did McCarver post this? I think everyone wants Dunn on next year's team UNLESS Wayne trades him and gets something better than Dunn...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,808
|
Re: Sweet Jesus, a positive Adam Dunn article
Quote:
I think the issue is that he isn't improving and, in some respects, he is regressing. 2004: .266/.388/.569 with 46 HR, 102 RBI, 105 R 2005: .247/.388/.540 with 40 HR, 101 RBI, 107 R 2006: .234/.365/.490 with 40 HR, 92 RBI, 99 R Dunn is still young so most people (including myself) would have thought that his 2004 season would be the tip of the iceberg at age 24. But he hasn't built on that season at all. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |