![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
hollywood mid westerner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 185
|
REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 51.1 million
Good snag for them..they'll make that posting money back and get one helluva pitcher. beckett, papelbon, lester, and matzsuzaka are all 26 and younger and will be pretty tough next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,027
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
a little pricey IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,408
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Hopefully this stops the Red Sox fans from whining about the Yankees spending habits. But that's probably just wishful thinking on my part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Quote:
Nice get for the Sox. If you're going to be a big market team then be a big market team. Though I wonder if that means the Sox are going to try to cut some costs elsewhere (e.g. Covelli Crisp).
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,477
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Quote:
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
hollywood mid westerner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 185
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
i dont mind that they spent that much on that kind of talent...believe me, there are ways for THIS front office to be able to spend up to 80 million a year on the team if they wanted to..but they choose not to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,913
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
I think we're about to see them offer him crap salary and he'll go back to Japan for a year and come back as a real FA.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
That's the Newston Angeles Mebs you mean.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. Last edited by M2; 11-13-2006 at 05:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Quote:
Off the top of my head, I'm thinking 15+ M/YR. I can't imagine they'd throw 20+ M at him, but Theo's team got embarassed last year, they need to do something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 1,361
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
The 8th best record in the AL this season. A team that is aging badly and has many, many holes in it. Their answer is to spend 40 million for the right to negotiate with a client of Scott Boras. 40 million plus 10 million per season. All of this for a pitcher from Japan? Japanese pitchers are notorious for their mediocrity in the U.S. This is going to be so ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 308
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
It makes no sense unless they are paying him less than $10MM per year. The $42MM works out to $8.5 to $10.5 per year on a four or five year deal, so if they pay him salary of more than $10MM the Sox are looking at paying more than $20MM per year for him. They could get Clemens (a known quantity not requiring the long term investment of nearly $100MM ) for $20MM. I guess I'm thinking about Irabu and having trouble wrapping my mind around this one. Other than Clemens, even #1 proven aces aren't quite getting $20MM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,328
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
It only makes sense if they can make money off having him, like with Japanese advertising and things like that. I don't know if that's possible, but there has to be some reason they were willing to bid that high, assuming it wasn't just to play keep-away with NYY. And, if they don't actually sign him, it doesn't cost them anything.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Quote:
I'm pretty sure (although I could be wrong) that the 42M doesn't go to the player, but rather his team, Seibu. The 42M was just a fee to allow the Red Sox to now negotiate a contract. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 1,361
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: REd Sox win Matzsuzaka bid at 42 million
Good for the Japanese team bad for the Sox
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |