RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2006, 09:46 AM   #46
Krusty
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 12,311
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

I think Krivsky is out to improve the defense. The right side of the infield is solid with Hatteberg and Phillips. Gonzalez would be a huge upgrade on the left side. Hopefully (fingers crossed) Encarncion can improve on his throws. If not, you will see Castro playing third in the eight and ninth innings.

How Krivsky improves the outfield defense will be very interesting to watch.
__________________
If you think small, you'll go nowhere in life.
Krusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-17-2006, 03:07 PM   #47
Superdude
Member
 
Superdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
I think Krivsky is out to improve the defense.
Sure Gonzalez and Phillips is a little better defensively than Phillips and Freel, but unless Phillips absolutely sucks at shortstop and Gonzalez has a breakout year with the bat, there is no way adding Gonzalez is an upgrade.
Superdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 04:12 PM   #48
Cedric
Member
 
Cedric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superdude View Post
Sure Gonzalez and Phillips is a little better defensively than Phillips and Freel, but unless Phillips absolutely sucks at shortstop and Gonzalez has a breakout year with the bat, there is no way adding Gonzalez is an upgrade.
I don't see Freel as a 2b, hopefully the Reds don't either.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back.
Cedric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 04:27 PM   #49
jimbo
Member
 
jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Troy, OH
Posts: 2,538
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cedric View Post
I don't see Freel as a 2b, hopefully the Reds don't either.
I somewhat disagree with you Cedric. I think Freel has shown he can play the position quite well, plus he would be more prone to staying healthier playing 2B as opposed to the outfield. I'm not saying I'm advocating it because I think this team is in need of new blood, but I do believe he could be a very good second baseman if he was given a chance at it full-time.
jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 04:31 PM   #50
Cedric
Member
 
Cedric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbo View Post
I somewhat disagree with you Cedric. I think Freel has shown he can play the position quite well, plus he would be more prone to staying healthier playing 2B as opposed to the outfield. I'm not saying I'm advocating it because I think this team is in need of new blood, but I do believe he could be a very good second baseman if he was given a chance at it full-time.
I would much rather see Freel at 2b than say Castro at SS and Phillips at 2b.

I would just love to have Griffey out of CF and replace him with Freel.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back.
Cedric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 04:51 PM   #51
jimbo
Member
 
jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Troy, OH
Posts: 2,538
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cedric View Post
I would much rather see Freel at 2b than say Castro at SS and Phillips at 2b.

I would just love to have Griffey out of CF and replace him with Freel.
I totally agree with your first statement. I don't want Castro anywhere near a starting lineup.

I'm all for finding a replacement for Junior in CF, I just don't like Freel there. I think he plays too wrecklessly for that position. The diving catches are fun to watch, but too many times he's diving when he shouldn't which will lead to serious injuries if he plays there full-time or balls that go to the fence with runners on base. There are certain situations when diving, even though it looks good, isn't sound baseball and I don't think Freel gets that.
jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 05:39 PM   #52
Superdude
Member
 
Superdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
I don't see Freel as a 2b, hopefully the Reds don't either.
He may not win a gold glove, but Freel can't be that bad. With his bat, Freel would have to suck in record breaking fashion on the defensive end in order to be outperformed by Gonzalez as an overall player. I feel like I'm the minority, but I still don't see how paying Gonzalez 15 million helps the team in anyway.
Superdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 06:55 PM   #53
Raisor
Member
 
Raisor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,683
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Gonzalez for three years is about two years too long.
__________________
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures."
Raisor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 07:16 PM   #54
Tom Servo
thirsty and miserable
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,411
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Reds mum on Gonzalez
BY JOHN FAY | ENQUIRER STAFF WRITER

Rumor has the Reds in the running for shortstop Alex Gonzalez. The Boston Globe has reported that the Reds may be one of two teams offering Gonzalez a three-year, $15 million deal.

On Friday, Reds general manager Wayne Krivsky refused to discuss the rumor.

"I'm not going to confirm it or deny or it," Krivsky said.

Have you talked to Gonzalez's agent?

"I've talked to a lot of agents," Krivsky said. "We're not going to talk about who we've talked to and who we haven't."

Gonzalez's agent, Eric Goldschmidt, did not return a call Friday afternoon.

A lot of teams make it public when they meet with free agents. That is not Krivsky's style.

"We won't announce anything until a deal is done and the player's signed and had a physical," Krivsky said.

The talk of the Reds and Gonzalez may be just a matter of people putting two and two together: The Reds need a shortstop and Gonzalez is the best one available on the free agent market.

He hit .255 with nine home runs and 50 RBI last year, but he is a superior fielder.

With Krivsky's goal of improving the defense, making an effort to sign Gonzalez would make sense

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.d...PT04/311170040
Tom Servo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 11:26 PM   #55
Will M
Brett William Moore
 
Will M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
my two cents

1. SS is a defense first position. I like ( in theory ) that WK wants defense at SS.

2. if the Reds have Gonzalez ( or similar weak stick ) at SS, Phillips at 2B, Deno in CF and Valentin/Ross at C then we need to have some big bats at 3B,1B,LF & RF.
EE and Dunn are big bats. Hatteberg is not. Griffey at this stage is OK vs rhp and terrible vs lhp. We will need Votto to be ready AND need better production from RF.

3. 3 years at $5,000,000/year? ouch. I would have thought 1 year at $2,000,000. Isn't there a cheaper slick fielding/weak hitting SS available?
The 2007 free agent market is nuts.

- Will
Will M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 11:52 PM   #56
Will M
Brett William Moore
 
Will M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
from FoxSports today

A new shortstop in Cincinnati?

Free-agent shortstop Alex Gonzalez is believed to be close to signing a three-year contract with the Reds.

Gonzalez's agent, Eric Goldschmidt, said he expects to complete a deal by the start of next week, but would not specify with which club.

The White Sox, a team speculated to be involved with Gonzalez, have not contacted Goldschmidt, according to a major-league source.

The Blue Jays also have shown interest in Gonzalez, but a second source said they would balk at the rumored price — three years, $15 million.

Gonzalez, 28, is one of the game's top defensive shortstops, but his .179 batting average with runners in scoring position last season was the lowest in the majors.

The Red Sox are pursuing free-agent shortstop Julio Lugo, who would be a significant offensive upgrade over Gonzalez.
Will M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2006, 12:23 AM   #57
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: from FoxSports today

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will M View Post
Gonzalez, 28, is one of the game's top defensive shortstops, but his .179 batting average with runners in scoring position last season was the lowest in the majors.
... worst at the majors in the most important stat in the game. Well at least he'll make Dunn look good. :
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2006, 12:25 AM   #58
Superdude
Member
 
Superdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

So it's a pretty sure thing now?

I'm not gonna lie. It's a big risk and I'm still not a huge fan, but I'm starting to see a bit of upside and hope to this deal after my anger has settled. His last two years have been absolute train wrecks, but you can't overlook the fact that the guy put up seasons of 18 and 23 homers in that massive Florida park. Even if he puts up a .300OBP, here's to hoping Gonzalez joins Aurilia, Hatteberg, Randa... and turns a GABP corner to a breakout season and macs 30 homers!

Last edited by Superdude; 11-18-2006 at 12:44 AM.
Superdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2006, 01:28 AM   #59
Aronchis
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Hopefully not, Gonzalez is the type of player you shouldn't be paying multi-year contracts for as he can't hit a lick, he better have a power surge ala Rich lol. If Krivsky does this, further signs of incompetence IMO.

Find these types cheap.
Aronchis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2006, 01:50 AM   #60
fearofpopvol1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,634
Re: Are we getting Alex Gonzalez?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aronchis View Post
Hopefully not, Gonzalez is the type of player you shouldn't be paying multi-year contracts for as he can't hit a lick, he better have a power surge ala Rich lol. If Krivsky does this, further signs of incompetence IMO.

Find these types cheap.
You can't in the current marketplace. Have you seen other signings? Frank freaking Thomas is getting 9 million a year to be an elderly DH...
fearofpopvol1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25