RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2006, 02:02 PM   #1
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
How about a Garland?

It looks like the White Sox are on the verge of dealing him according to this Foxsports article. However take note that although it's speculated that it might be the Rangers, it doesn't actually state who it is. Could it be us, we certainly would have a need in a GB pitcher with durability. I guess I would prefer Jason Jennings but Garland isn't bad! But what young arm(s) would it cost us?


Quote:
White Sox close to dealing Garland
Ken Rosenthal / FOXSports.com
Posted: Friday



The White Sox are close to trading right-hander Jon Garland, according to a rival executive, and the Rangers appear to be the most logical fit.

The Rangers pursued Garland at the general managers' meetings in Naples, Fla., and White Sox G.M. Ken Williams is intrigued by several of the Rangers' pitching prospects.
Minor-league left-hander John Danks likely would be part of any Rangers package for Garland, a sinker-baller whose style would adapt well to Texas' hitter-friendly Ameriquest Field.

The Orioles and other clubs also have engaged the White Sox in talks about Garland. The White Sox have been seeking young pitching for one of their veteran starters.

A deal between the White Sox and Rangers also could be expanded to include White Sox center fielder Brian Anderson. The Rangers could lose center fielder Gary Matthews Jr. to free agency.

Garland, 27, is signed for $10 million in 2007 and $12 million in '08. He has worked 211 or more innings in each of the past three seasons and won 18 games in each of the past two. However, his ERA rose from a career-best 3.50 in 2005 to 4.51 last season.

__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-19-2006, 02:20 PM   #2
reds44
#TheReturn
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,672
Re: How about a Garland?

We don't have the horses to get him.
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 02:24 PM   #3
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: How about a Garland?

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
We don't have the horses to get him.
I don't know--I think the White Sox would be happy just dumping the guy.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 02:29 PM   #4
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
Re: How about a Garland?

Cueto? Wood? Pelland? I would consider dealing almost anyone else in the minors besides Bailey, Wood and EZ (I still believe he can be an outstanding back of the rotation arm). That said only Bailey is a no-no unless someone gives us the moon.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 02:53 PM   #5
harangatang
Member
 
harangatang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,493
Re: How about a Garland?

I think Judy is more on the Reds budget.
harangatang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 03:57 PM   #6
Johnny Footstool
Churlish
 
Johnny Footstool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,669
Re: How about a Garland?

Garland is a prime example of how pitch-to-contact pitchers can go from good to bad in the blink of an eye.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful
Johnny Footstool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 04:33 PM   #7
red-in-la
Member
 
red-in-la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 6,536
Re: How about a Garland?

Well....somebody this side of Roy Oswalt has to be good enough....

Harang didn't throw hard enough, Arroyo was fodder.....so, who would be good enough?
__________________
"Is there a problem officers?"
red-in-la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 04:40 PM   #8
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,691
Re: How about a Garland?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
I don't know--I think the White Sox would be happy just dumping the guy.
I think they would too. They're looking for a back-up catcher. The reds could even the money some in 2007 by trading Larue for him. As long as the money doesn't stop a Harang deal.
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 12:32 AM   #9
GoGoWhiteSox
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 175
Re: How about a Garland?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool View Post
Garland is a prime example of how pitch-to-contact pitchers can go from good to bad in the blink of an eye.
Umm...Jon Garland has won a combined 36 games over the course of 2005 and 2006. I think he's finally hitting his stride, not going from good to bad.
GoGoWhiteSox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 12:42 AM   #10
guttle11
Raaaaaaaandy
 
guttle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,118
Re: How about a Garland?

Quote:
Originally Posted by harangatang View Post
I think Judy is more on the Reds budget.

That darn drug testing is standing in the way, though.
__________________
"I saw Wedding Crashers accidentally. I bought a ticket for Grizzly Man and went into the wrong theater. After an hour, I figured I was in the wrong theater, but I kept waiting. That’s the thing about bear attacks. They come when you least expect it."-Dwight K. Schrute
guttle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 12:53 AM   #11
schroomytunes
Member
 
schroomytunes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wilmington n.c.
Posts: 928
Re: How about a Garland?

If we were to trade for Jon GArland, then Im sure CHW would be inquiring about Bailey. I for one would not trade for Garland if Baileys gotta be sold. Now I would make this trade with the White Sox though.

Reds trade: David Ross

White Sox trade: Sean Tracey

The White Sox need a backup catcher behind Pierzinski, and Ross would provide much needed insurance at that position. While the Reds gain an arm for the bullpen, and free up a spot for another OF.
schroomytunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 01:12 AM   #12
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: How about a Garland?

Garland's the new Jeff Suppan, the quintessential league average guy.

Sure, he had a career year in 2005, but outside of that season his ERA+ has been 100, 99, 100 and 103 in his four other full seasons an a MLB starter.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.

Last edited by M2; 11-20-2006 at 09:17 AM.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 03:20 AM   #13
cincyinco
We are the angry mob
 
cincyinco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The 303
Posts: 2,479
Re: How about a Garland?

Would you guys make a trade for Garland if you could get a guy like Brian Anderson involved?
__________________
"I hate to advocate chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone... But they've always worked for me."

-Hunter S. Thompson
cincyinco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 09:36 AM   #14
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: How about a Garland?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyinco View Post
Would you guys make a trade for Garland if you could get a guy like Brian Anderson involved?

The same Brian Anderson who stunk up the joint in 2006? We have a player on our roster right now who might be one notch of a downgrade defensively, but can definitely outhit Mr. Anderson: Chris Denorfia.

Why would we want to go acquire another great CF defensive talent that will never be our everyday CF?

Now if we could send Griffey to the White Sox for some sort of starting pitching help, sign me up.
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 09:39 AM   #15
Johnny Footstool
Churlish
 
Johnny Footstool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,669
Re: How about a Garland?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoGoWhiteSox View Post
Umm...Jon Garland has won a combined 36 games over the course of 2005 and 2006. I think he's finally hitting his stride, not going from good to bad.
You can thank the White Sox offense for his wins.
Check his roller-coaster WHIP and ERA numbers from 2004, 2005, and 2006. His K/9 has been very consistent and very low. He relies on his defense to generate outs, which leads to inconsistent performance from year to year.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful
Johnny Footstool is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25