![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
How about a Garland?
It looks like the White Sox are on the verge of dealing him according to this Foxsports article. However take note that although it's speculated that it might be the Rangers, it doesn't actually state who it is. Could it be us, we certainly would have a need in a GB pitcher with durability. I guess I would prefer Jason Jennings but Garland isn't bad! But what young arm(s) would it cost us?
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,672
|
Re: How about a Garland?
We don't have the horses to get him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: How about a Garland?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Cueto? Wood? Pelland? I would consider dealing almost anyone else in the minors besides Bailey, Wood and EZ (I still believe he can be an outstanding back of the rotation arm). That said only Bailey is a no-no unless someone gives us the moon.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,493
|
Re: How about a Garland?
I think Judy is more on the Reds budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,669
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Garland is a prime example of how pitch-to-contact pitchers can go from good to bad in the blink of an eye.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 6,536
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Well....somebody this side of Roy Oswalt has to be good enough....
Harang didn't throw hard enough, Arroyo was fodder.....so, who would be good enough?
__________________
"Is there a problem officers?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,691
|
Re: How about a Garland?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 175
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Umm...Jon Garland has won a combined 36 games over the course of 2005 and 2006. I think he's finally hitting his stride, not going from good to bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Raaaaaaaandy
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,118
|
Re: How about a Garland?
That darn drug testing is standing in the way, though.
__________________
"I saw Wedding Crashers accidentally. I bought a ticket for Grizzly Man and went into the wrong theater. After an hour, I figured I was in the wrong theater, but I kept waiting. That’s the thing about bear attacks. They come when you least expect it."-Dwight K. Schrute |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wilmington n.c.
Posts: 928
|
Re: How about a Garland?
If we were to trade for Jon GArland, then Im sure CHW would be inquiring about Bailey. I for one would not trade for Garland if Baileys gotta be sold. Now I would make this trade with the White Sox though.
Reds trade: David Ross White Sox trade: Sean Tracey The White Sox need a backup catcher behind Pierzinski, and Ross would provide much needed insurance at that position. While the Reds gain an arm for the bullpen, and free up a spot for another OF. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Garland's the new Jeff Suppan, the quintessential league average guy.
Sure, he had a career year in 2005, but outside of that season his ERA+ has been 100, 99, 100 and 103 in his four other full seasons an a MLB starter.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. Last edited by M2; 11-20-2006 at 09:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
We are the angry mob
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The 303
Posts: 2,479
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Would you guys make a trade for Garland if you could get a guy like Brian Anderson involved?
__________________
"I hate to advocate chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone... But they've always worked for me." -Hunter S. Thompson |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Quote:
The same Brian Anderson who stunk up the joint in 2006? We have a player on our roster right now who might be one notch of a downgrade defensively, but can definitely outhit Mr. Anderson: Chris Denorfia. Why would we want to go acquire another great CF defensive talent that will never be our everyday CF? Now if we could send Griffey to the White Sox for some sort of starting pitching help, sign me up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,669
|
Re: How about a Garland?
Quote:
Check his roller-coaster WHIP and ERA numbers from 2004, 2005, and 2006. His K/9 has been very consistent and very low. He relies on his defense to generate outs, which leads to inconsistent performance from year to year.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |