![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greentown, IN
Posts: 167
|
Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
Reds would deal Adam Dunn, Ryan Freel & Rheal Cormier for John Garland, Scot Podsednik & Joe Crede. This would give us a lineup of:
Ross - c Encarnacion - 1b Phillips - 2b Crede - 3b Gonzalez - ss Podsednik - lf Denorfia - cf? Griffey -rf? Rotation: Harang Arroyo Garland Milton Lohse |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
no deal
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,070
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
If the Reds made that trade, I would literally turn into Linda Blair in the Exorcist...we're talking the head spinning around, projectile vomiting, Tourette's, levitation, the whole nine yards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Let's ride
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
Oh how I hope Podsednik never, ever wears a Reds uniform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Passion for the game
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 8,080
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
No deal. I'd like to have Crede for Cormier but I'd probably have to give Kenny Williams about 6 pints of JD intravenously to make that happen.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,070
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
White, speedy, short of stature, "makes contact," unbelievably overrated...my God, there'd be a civic orgasm.
Last edited by dsmith421; 12-15-2006 at 04:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Let's ride
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado's eastern plains
Posts: 11,232
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,670
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
No deal, Howie.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
if he does then might as well bring in Casey Daigle. The Reds would at least have some hot wives in the seats.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,400
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,509
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
That sounds awful to me.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,921
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
Any trade of Adum Dunn that does not return offense puts us in a BIG hole.
We haven't had too many significant changes to our roster since the 2nd half of last year, post "the trade". After "the trade" last year, we had the 27th best OPS in baseball and the 10th best ERA. Rich Aurilia was far and away our most productive offensive player post trade. He's gone. Yes, Dunn is going to rebound from his crap 2nd half. Yes, we now have EE for a full year. This offense simply cannot lose Dunn without becoming one of the, if not the, worst in baseball. Joe Crede had a nice season, but he's not even close to a replacement production wise for Dunn.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Matt's Dad
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,509
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
Keep Adam Dunn unless totally blown away.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble. Fame is man given: be thankful. Conceit is self given: be careful. John Wooden |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Oy Vey!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,252
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,921
|
Re: Deal or no deal - Reds White Sox Style
Quote:
Furthermore, Crede's success was driven by a higher batting average and slugging, which are more variance prone than patience. I would love to have Crede on my squad. I wouldn't want him at the expense of Dunn. Scott Podsednick is a slightly worse version Ryan Freel. Garland would make a nice #3 starter, which is where the deal gains a little steam. I don't think it's a horrible trade offer in terms of fairness. In fact, I think most Sox fans would turn it down in heartbeat. However, Crede has reached his upside potential. Dunn just had a down year. Buying high and selling low is rarely a winning strategy.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |