![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,067
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 193
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
If this was in Cinci, it's Bengals all the way. I see the Colts coming out strong here. Colts 34, Bengals 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
First Time Caller
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,224
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
I think not having Dallas Clark is big. The Bengals have trouble stopping him...and just about any quality tight end in the league. But I cannot imagine Manning will have another bad game. The Colts offense is just too good.
This game will be decided by takeaways. Whichever team forces the ball to pop out more is going to win. All other possessions may result in TDs. I think it's dead even with a slight advantage to the Colts for playing at home.
__________________
Dusty Baker, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sellersburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,258
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
I just don't have a good feeling about this game. The Colts are still a damn good football team.
I say Colts 34, Bengals 21.
__________________
DLC11@Insightbb.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
Gotta consider holding them to a FG attempt as a victory for the defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,452
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
Is it me or does ESPN coverage leave alot to be desired? I would like just to watch the game not all of their extra stuff. Damn I hate ESPN with a passion.
__________________
I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 7,941
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
Yep. A case of 'less is more'.
Rem |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Bunn-O-matic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sugarcreek, Ohio
Posts: 2,698
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
I don't know that I've watched a game yet this year--college or pro where Matthew McConaughey hasn't been in the booth. Enough already!
__________________
For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
@#$%
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
Could be some major injury problems for the Bengals. Willie Anderson is out with an ankle injury and they said Carson's shoulder looked hurt at the end of the half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 7,941
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
Quote:
Rem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Potential Lunch Winner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
K-Fed is was in the wrestling ring tonight...
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,732
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
Tory James needs to retire.. he cant cover anyone anymore!!.. really sucks our CB's are not doing their jobs tonight
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,636
|
Re: MNF: Bengals/Colts
I am very disappointed in the game plan on both sides of the ball for this game. A straight zone with deep drops by the linebackers and overdoing it on the run on the offensive side. Sure, let Peyton Manning pick you apart with wide open receivers over the middle. Bresnihan has been teetering for me, tonight sends me over the edge. No personnel excuses, tonight was a disaster plan from the first snap.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |