![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: WEST CARROLLTON OHIO
Posts: 1,227
|
Trade Idea
Would you trade EE for Ervin Santana or Angels ? Then we could sign A. Boone or David Bell to play third or sign both cause they would be cheaper that spending for other pitchers on market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
GO GO SOX!!! (and Reds)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 34
|
Re: Trade
I would seriously consider it but i don't think LAA are going to do that with out getting some pitching in return. So I don't see it happening
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
This one's for you Edd
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Area
Posts: 8,471
|
Re: Trade
Oh where I have I seen this thread before..........
Oh wait, nevermind, it was an ORG thread. Carry on.
__________________
Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: WEST CARROLLTON OHIO
Posts: 1,227
|
Re: Trade
Sorry I can't post on ORG so I moved it over to here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 389
|
Re: Trade
Doesn't LAA have a bunch of 3rd base options already? McPherson, Brandon Woods(SS) and another one(Aybar??). O.Cabrera has a long term contract and plays SS, Woods is major league ready and needs a position, Glaus was let go for McPherson, etc.
As a fan I would hate to lose a young EE and have the offense lose some fire power. Thankfully the Angels have other options. But I would like E.Santana in a Reds uniform as well as any other young pitcher of his caliber. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: Trade
Quote:
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky Last edited by Spitball; 12-19-2006 at 03:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: Trade
No way would I do that. Giving up your best young hitter for a shaky pitcher? I'd pass. The Reds simply don't have enough hitting as is, and to trade youth away without it being a move that would make you an immediate contender just doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: Trade
Quote:
What other alternative do the Reds have to improve their pitching and their chances of winning 3/5 of their games?
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: Trade
Quote:
Santana went 10-2 at home, 3.02 ERA, 1.10 WHIP....... on the road? How about 6-6, 5.95 ERA, 1.40 WHIP. Also, look at his post all-star numbers of 6-5, 4.68 ERA, and 1.30 WHIP. What do you think he'd do in GABP? Now, look at Edwin. That kid is a future star, and he's not far from it. His numbers compare very favorably to David Wrights. He has a great glove, albeit an erratic arm. Also, this team has very little offense right now. You're gonna get rid of an excellent, cheap bat? No thanks, I'll just hold my breath, and wait for Homer. I think Elizardo should rebound nicely this year, and Milton can be good at times. This staff, while not great, isn't terrible, and they aren't an Ervin Santana away from winning the WS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: Trade
I still don't buy the shaky part. Compared with the Reds' 3,4, and 5 starters, he looks pretty good. His second half WHIP was almost as good as Harang's WHIP for the year, and that was against American League batting orders.
I like Edwin Encarnacion. I think he has a great future, but to get a valuable component to a winning team, the Reds are going to have to give up something of value. Good third basemen are easier to develop, trade for, or sign than good starting pitchers. Many also used the same arguments when the Pena for Arroyo trade was made. With Santana in the rotation, about 100 games would be started by pitchers who averaged 15 wins last season. Without Santana, the Reds will start three starters in nearly 100 games who have little reason to be in a big league rotation.
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: Trade
one big question on Santana. In todays pitching market, why would a team be willing to give up a young, supposedly outstanding pitcher? He's been the guy they've consistently shopped. Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: Trade
Quote:
Quote:
Being shopped is not a red flag for a starting pitcher. It is a window of opportunity.
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |