![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 97
|
Are the Reds finished?
I am starting to think that any major moves are not going to happen. That means that are lineup is as follows?
C David Ross 1B Scott Hatteberg 2B Brandon Phillips SS Alex Gonzalez 3B Edwin Encarnacion LF Adam Dunn CF Ken Griffey Jr. RF Freel/Deno/Conine/Crosby Are you serious? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,686
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
Swap Crosby for Josh Hamilton and there you have it. That's your 2007 Cincinnati Reds. I give the over under of runs scored at 625. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,411
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Yes, until July
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Just hope this team doesnt play over their heads early. Things would be looking much better for this franchise had they tanked early last season and been sellers at the deadline. The quickest way to turn this thing around and the most realistic way in my opinion is by stripping it down at the deadline. Keep your core (Harang, Dunn, EE) and maybe a few others but anything else should be fair game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
2009: Fail
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 7,441
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
__________________
a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude. I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: We have pitchers now?!
Posts: 1,017
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
I'll add to that core of young players we should keep.
Phillips (even weak sticked his defense is stellar) Coffey Bray Weathers (Clutch closer and yes he's not young, but I'd rather have him to teach these younger guys the ropes than say Cormier or Stanton.) Everyone else can be packaged and shipped for major league ready talent. Start fixing the wholes we have and get ready for a time where we can be competitive for years to come. Not having to worry about a "year to year" basis. Cause seriously, you want to fix this team. Sell high, get your ML ready talent and call it a day. It's what Florida did and I have to say, they did very good with Uggla, Rameriez, all the young pitching they stock piled etc. If you seem to sit there and think that this team doesn't need a complete make over you're kidding. Our outfield defense is going to be the worst in baseball expecially if Conine because everyday RF. He doesn't add the power bat we need, he doesn't add the contact we need, does he give profressional at-bats? What the hell are those anyway? Hatteberg is not the answer at first either. Craig Wilson everyday, with Conine and Hatteberg as our bench "vet" prescense, would have been the answer. Who cares if Craig stumbles abit? Give him a two year deal with the second year being a club option. If he doesnt perform, cut him and start over. It's that simple. We gave two years to Stanton, why not Wilson? Conine is two million for a year. Wilson would be what? Five million a year? Add pay-roll to fill gaps and show free-agents that you aren't lying. Show your fans you arent lying. Right now all I see is a GM/Owner, saving face and praying that one of these guys has a career year while we build up our minors. Sure, build up the minors but don't neglect the majors in doing so. Right now I see a few agents we can sign and have a good team with.. Harrang. Arroyo. Ohka Armas Milton Trade Loshe. That's a DECENT starting rotation, and with our added defense up the middle thats enough to make us legit contenders in the start-rotation department. Now for bats, easy enough. 1b Craig Wilson 2b Brandon Phillips 3b Edwin SS A-Gon LF Dunn CF Denorfia/Freel/Trade RF Griffey C Ross/Valentine Hows that for competetive? Thats the team we SHOULD be seeing. Enough promises. More WORKING. Talk is cheap, but ticket prices and losing fans isn't. Put your words to the checkbook and start getting these guys.
__________________
"For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled." -Hunter S. Thompson Last edited by Dracodave; 12-24-2006 at 12:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,668
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
You guys need to chill out about the offense. It will probably be league average.
1B Hatteberg/Conine 2B Phillips SS Gonzo 3B Edwin LF Dunn CF Freel/Deno RF Griffey That isn't a terrible lineup. It's not as good as opening day of last year, but it's not bad. We need another pitcher. If we get a guy like Okha I will be satisfied with the offseason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lebanon KY
Posts: 151
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
I can't believe WK will go into ST without a bona fide closer. If expects a committee of Weathers, Coffey, Bray, Majewski and Stanton to man the closers role for the Reds then 70-75 wins are in order.
__________________
Welcome Billy Gillispie to the Kentucky Wildcats - 2009 National Champs |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,686
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Brett William Moore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
Conine might get some OF at bats but he was obtained to play 1B with Hatteberg until Votto is ready. Griffey will be in RF 100-120 games with Deno or Freel in RF the other 40-60. Freel will also get time at 2b/3b when people need a day off. This lineup is worse offensively than opening day 2006 but is much better defensively. I too am happy with the offseason. I didn't expect a massive Dunn trade. I am happy we didn't sign some awful long term contracts. If we can put a competitive team on the field in 2007 I will watch. I think 2008/2009 is when the Reds will contend.
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
#TheReturn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,668
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
2009: Fail
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 7,441
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
Jr should be in RF, but thus far we've been given no indication this will happen. There's been whispers and hopes but nothing definate. Maybe it will happen, as I think that it will be a good move to move him to RF and platoon Freel/Deno in CF, but as yet we've got nothing to base a JR move to RF other than hope. I too am glad to didn't get itchy and sign a bad long term contract from this years crop of FA agents. The last thing we need are any more Milton-esque contracts.
__________________
a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude. I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate Last edited by Ltlabner; 12-24-2006 at 02:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,299
|
Re: Are the Reds finished?
Quote:
in the past , we have done this with the spare parts and got back guys like josh hancock..machado...chick etc. not exactly guys who are gonna lead you to promised land. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |