![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
2009: Fail
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 7,441
|
John Thomson to the Jays
Assuming he would have been interested in Cincinanti would he have been a viable option for the rotation? Reasonable contract. Not stellar numbers but at least on the surface servicable. However he only pitched 80 innings in 18 starts. Injury perhaps?
Quote:
Code:
GS CG IP H R ER HR BB SO W L ERA Total --210 10 1259 1385 729 657 154 366 797 62 84 4.69
__________________
a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude. I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate Last edited by Ltlabner; 01-09-2007 at 04:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,027
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
As we get closer to Febuary, does it seem like the prices are dropping?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,069
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
That seems like a steal for the Jays. I'm assuming Thomson's health is an issue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,402
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
Forget Zito and whoever, this the type of signing I would have liked to see Wayne make.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
This one's for you Edd
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Area
Posts: 8,471
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
I would have spent $550k on John Thomson. The only negative is that I'd spend that money on baseballs that leave the yard at GABP. So, in reality it's 1.1 million.
Good Move by the Jays.
__________________
Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 187
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
Quote:
I agree and have been disappointed that he has not made some signings like this! It is really what I expected him to do! Carlos Pena would have been a good gamble to name one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 1,361
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
Exactly, and that is why the Reds have not been as active as many would have liked. Two months ago he would have cost twice that. Now, WK can look around and see that there is still some good talent out there and if he so chooses he can get it at a fairly good price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
So Long Uncle Joe
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton,Ohio
Posts: 3,849
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
That's a nice price. Meanwhile we'll be paying Milton 9M for less production. Likely way less production.
__________________
0 Value Over Replacement Poster "Sit over here next to Johnathan (Bench)...sit right here, he's smart."--Sparky Anderson |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Kittens give Morbo gas
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 331
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
Toronto, while not quite the homer-happy park, is a pretty good hitter's park. I'm surprised WK couldn't swing a "let's hope so" contract like this.
Maybe it's the time passing, but I thought Thomson was going to get a bit more cash than this in free agency. Not because he's good, just what the market looked like it was demanding.
__________________
No one expects the butterfly |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
2009: Fail
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 7,441
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
I'm inclined to agree FCB.
__________________
a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude. I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 508
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
C'mon Wayne, quit sittin' on your hands...a gamble worth taking. He could very well be a 500,000 Milton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
hollywood mid westerner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 185
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
mike stanton has to be laughing his butt off right now on the golf course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
GO GO SOX!!! (and Reds)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 34
|
Re: John Thomson to the Jays
I think the Reds blew an pretty good opportunity on this one.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |