RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2007, 05:27 PM   #1
reds44
#TheReturn
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,671
C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
OK, while I'm waiting, here's my roster math:
Rotation (5)
Harang
Arroyo
Milton
Lohse
Saarloos

Bullpen (7)
Weathers
Coffey
Bray
Cormier
Stanton
?
?

Starting position players (8)
C - Ross
1B - Hatteberg
2B - Phillips
3B - Encarnacion
SS - Gonzalez
LF - Dunn
OF - Freel
OF - Griffey

Bench (5)
INF Castro
OF Hamilton
1B/COF Conine
C/1B Valentin
??

That gives us 22 spots that are filled, or as Jerry Narron likes to say, "in cement" (although Saarloos' geography isn't 100 percent, but his spot on the team is)

This list is assuming Majewski starts the season on the DL. If he doesn't, that means there are just two spots -- a pitcher and a position player -- left.

There's a lot of wiggle room with that bench spot. It could be a position player, an outfielder or a catcher. The catcher would make sense because Valentin is the team's top pinch-hitter. So maybe he serves that role as much as catcher. Because he's such a valuable pinch-hitter, they may need that third catcher because an 'emergency' catcher wouldn't be needed only in emergencies. Something to think about.

The bullpen? If Wilson keeps pitching well, he could start the season in the rotation and then you could move Saarloos to the bullpen. Belisle is a valuable guy.
Not alot to argue with there.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
Uncle does it again
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 03-12-2007, 05:52 PM   #2
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Some tough choices coming up. Time to dump some salary and go with the cheaper more effective guys.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 06:21 PM   #3
11larkin11
Member
 
11larkin11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bellefontaine,OH
Posts: 2,287
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

I think Belisle is a lock, most likely in the pen, but maybe he could sneak into the rotation (cut Milton!)
__________________
Domo Arigato, Here Comes Joey Votto

---TRF

"I do what I want to do and say what I want to say."

--Bronson Arroyo
11larkin11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 06:40 PM   #4
Topcat
Member
 
Topcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,928
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

I wish thet would send Milton to The mets or anyone and eat half his salary. I truly believe our rotation would be far better with his subtraction.
__________________
2006 Redzone mock Draftee's- 1(st) Daniel Bard(redsox), 1(st sup)( Jordan Walden (Angels), 2(nd) rd.- Zach Britton(Orioles), 3(rd) Blair Erickson(Cardinals), 3(rd) Tim Norton( Yankees),(cuz its a Tim Hortons thing

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
Topcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 06:53 PM   #5
hebroncougar
Member
 
hebroncougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,017
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

If Matt Belisle doesn't come north with this team either A. He has gotten hurt between now and April 2nd or B. They still aren't serious about winning. With the way he has pitched, he's their 3rd best starter right now.
hebroncougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 06:55 PM   #6
toledodan
GO XAVIER!
 
toledodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: overland park, kansas
Posts: 1,620
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

i know its only been a couple of innings but dustin hermensen has looked good.
__________________
there's nothing like bowling a 300 game! 13 now and retired.


Ricky henderson has a higher OBP than C. patterson and he's retired. C. Trent 6-14-2008
toledodan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 07:43 PM   #7
wheels
Dented and Spent
 
wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,539
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Belisle will be the tragic figure of this spring.

He should be the team's third starter, but he'll be wasted in Louisville.

Shame on Wayne for continuing the Milton travesty.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012.
wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 07:45 PM   #8
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,824
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

It's amazing how much they didn't need some of the past calendar year's acquisitions.
edabbs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 07:48 PM   #9
redsmetz
Redsmetz
 
redsmetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winton Place
Posts: 10,455
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheels View Post
Belisle will be the tragic figure of this spring.

He should be the team's third starter, but he'll be wasted in Louisville.

Shame on Wayne for continuing the Milton travesty.
Wayne's saddled with an albatross and 8-10 Million for this year and he's supposed to just choke that one down? Frankly, that's absurd. I'm fine with moving him, but not at eating that huge salary.

I still doubt Cormier will be here. Also, another thought, is it possible that Bray starts in Louisville for now (ha, ha - I typed Indy first - showing my age, next I'll be saying Denver or Wichita or Nashville!).

This is not a bad problem to have - it means we've got some depth (even with the albatross contract).
redsmetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 07:52 PM   #10
wheels
Dented and Spent
 
wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,539
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
Wayne's saddled with an albatross and 8-10 Million for this year and he's supposed to just choke that one down? Frankly, that's absurd. I'm fine with moving him, but not at eating that huge salary.

I still doubt Cormier will be here. Also, another thought, is it possible that Bray starts in Louisville for now (ha, ha - I typed Indy first - showing my age, next I'll be saying Denver or Wichita or Nashville!).

This is not a bad problem to have - it means we've got some depth (even with the albatross contract).
I wouldn't have a problem with them eating that contract at all.

What's worse? Spending 8.5 mil on guy that gets his head beat in every fifth day, or spending 8.5 mil and not letting him get his head beat in every fifth day, while giving a younger, more talented player a chance to shine?

He's only got one year left, so get him out of there.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012.
wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 08:18 PM   #11
hebroncougar
Member
 
hebroncougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,017
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
Wayne's saddled with an albatross and 8-10 Million for this year and he's supposed to just choke that one down? Frankly, that's absurd. I'm fine with moving him, but not at eating that huge salary.

I still doubt Cormier will be here. Also, another thought, is it possible that Bray starts in Louisville for now (ha, ha - I typed Indy first - showing my age, next I'll be saying Denver or Wichita or Nashville!).

This is not a bad problem to have - it means we've got some depth (even with the albatross contract).
If eating 8.5 mil., or getting someone who's going to be 6-12 with a 5.50 ERA, or letting Belisle start for 400K and he goes 11-7 with a 4.00 ERA, I'll eat the 8.5 mil. Or I pay him 5 mil, and get someone to take him for 3.5 mil.
hebroncougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 09:17 PM   #12
thatcoolguy_22
Battle Toad Historian
 
thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
Originally Posted by hebroncougar View Post
If eating 8.5 mil., or getting someone who's going to be 6-12 with a 5.50 ERA, or letting Belisle start for 400K and he goes 11-7 with a 4.00 ERA, I'll eat the 8.5 mil. Or I pay him 5 mil, and get someone to take him for 3.5 mil.
I would be happy to see Belisle put up those numbers over the season and it would be like we paid Belisle 8.9 million for the year. If we could find a sucker to take on some of that salary it would be phenomenal but I highly doubt it. I've said it before but Wang and the rest of the yankees staff is seriously over-rated
and they have the cash to spend...
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board.
thatcoolguy_22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 09:19 PM   #13
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,248
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
If eating 8.5 mil., or getting someone who's going to be 6-12 with a 5.50 ERA, or letting Belisle start for 400K and he goes 11-7 with a 4.00 ERA, I'll eat the 8.5 mil.
A lot of IFS there. I do not want to belittle Matt Belisle, but why should I (a REDS fan) believe that he can go 11-7 with a 4.00 ERA?

Quote:
Spending 8.5 mil on guy that gets his head beat in every fifth day, or spending 8.5 mil and not letting him get his head beat in every fifth day, while giving a younger, more talented player a chance to shine?
I am not a big fan of Eric Milton (more specifically his contract!). However, I did notice that he went 8-8 last season. He did get his head beat in twice last year when he pitched with a knee that needed surgery in April and pitched with a bad arm in September. When I deduct those two starts, he had a 4.41 ERA last year. He also pitched 14 QS in 26 GS... 14 QS in 24 GS if we take out two injured starts. Also lost 3 games when he threw a QS. Also had 3 no decisions when he threw a QS. Only won 1 game when he did not pitch a QS. Heck, he might have been 11-5 or better with some support from the rest of the team.

And what if one of these youger players gets his head beat in every fifth day? Sure it costs less, but will it ruin the mentality of a guy that might need more seasoning? Will it cause the REDS FO to lose faith in a guy that might have shined in 2008 or 2009? That too could be a tough price to pay... like eating $9 mill to watch it happen.

As Sam Wyche might say to the REDS fans who think the REDS can eat $9 million left by the previous regime, "You don't root for the New York Yankees, you root for the Cincinnati REDS!" I don't blame the diehards for wanting rid of Milton and his contract, but not too many teams with that payroll eat that much money. It is the modern day economics of baseball and the bad signing of the previous regime. Come next year it will no longer be discussed.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 09:19 PM   #14
UK Reds Fan
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CHATTANOOGA, TN USA
Posts: 278
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
It's amazing how much they didn't need some of the past calendar year's acquisitions.
I'd have to agree...the trades last year for Bray/Maj and Cormier were in a different reason to try and win a pennant.

But adding Stanton and Weathers, while not terrible contracts, but we had/have way cheaper alternatives without about same level of risk.

The Castro contract is another weird move IMO. Solved next to nothing excpet for spending an additional 1-2 million for no reason.

The Conine contract takes the cake in this whole scenario. What Wayne seen the need to sign him while facing Deno going AAA or Hopper for that matter is a complete waste of 2 million bucks.

All in all, in appears Wayne is sort of wasting about 11 million bucks (Lohse, Cormier, Castro, Conine and one of Stanton/Weathers) when we could have replaced those guys with Belisle, Ramirez, Burton, Shackelford, Salmon, Hopper and Deno all for each making less than 750k or league minimum.
UK Reds Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 09:24 PM   #15
Redsland
You know his story
 
Redsland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 7,713
Re: C.Trent Thinks 22 (including Hamilton) Are Locks

Quote:
Originally Posted by UK Reds Fan View Post
All in all, in appears Wayne is sort of wasting about 11 million bucks (Lohse, Cormier, Castro, Conine and one of Stanton/Weathers) when we could have replaced those guys with Belisle, Ramirez, Burton, Shackelford, Salmon, Hopper and Deno all for each making less than 750k or league minimum.
Perhaps, but in his defense, Wayne's owner has never complained about payroll. We fans are used to Lindner and Marge crowing about it, but Castellini never has.
__________________
Makes all the routine posts.
Redsland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25