![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
|
over 140 players to wear 42
I just heard on Mike and Mike in the morning that over 140 players including 3 entire teams will be wearing number 42 for the Robinson Anniversary.
My question; Is this taking it too far and possibly watering down the significance? MO I think there should only be 1 black player from each team wearing 42. Entire teams? I'm not entirely sure I agree. I like the sentiment expressed but I believe that the entire message will not be delivered. However when an entire team is wearing 42 then some younger kids might ask their parents why? Allowing the parents the opportunity to educate. So I can see the point. Nevermind, I'm not really sure how I feel about this. Discuss.
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
The Dodgers should all wear 42 that day, no question. Other than that, I'm more inclined to think one player per team.
I think Cleveland should have a player wear 42 and one wear Doby's number [I'm assuming its retired in Cleveland.]. Funny thing is, Houston is one of the teams with all players wearing the numbers.....why you might ask? Because they have no african american players on their roster.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
how about every team's 2nd basemen wear #42 to signify that jackie is still out there since that is the position he mostly played...
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,260
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
Quote:
Cecil Cooper is their bench coach, however.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Findlay & Western
Posts: 222
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
Why don't they just rename baseball "Jackie Robinson" and get it over with?
Are we going to try to outdo ourselves every year? Jackie Robinson was a great person and player and all that, but enough is enough. Lets leave some dignity in the story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
See, I think Junior was trying to give it some dignity, and baseball yet again found a way to mess it up in some context.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,228
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
One player doing it was kind of cool. Everyone doing it is kind of stupid. And, no it shouldn't only be black players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
CELEBRATION TIME
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 13,939
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
I don't see a problem if their was a non-black player wearing Jackie Robinson's number. Why does the person have to be black to honor him by wearing his number? And I don't see a problem with the whole team wearing his number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
lol now that it has been spoken aloud it doesn't make sense for only black people to be wearing 42. I stand by my earlier post that all 2nd basemen should wear it or only select players. Entire teams??? geesh
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,331
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
For one thing, if everyone on the team is wearing the same number, it could get a little confusing for the announcers and the official scorer.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
I had that thought, too. If numbers aren't necessary for the identification of players, then why have them in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
I agree Doo-Rag. I honestly think an entire team wearing the number 42 is the most rediculous thing Ive ever heard, and thought it was a joke the first time I heard about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,120
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
Quote:
And the one player should be a high character guy. If Bonds wore it, my head would blow up.
__________________
The motel of lost companions Waits with heated pool and bar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,260
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
Fixed that for ya.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9154229AAHu5je http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?...=.jsp&c_id=mlb
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. Last edited by dabvu2498; 04-13-2007 at 10:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 190
|
Re: over 140 players to wear 42
I think MLB took a good idea and messed it up. I'm with Torri Hunter on this. I think maybe each team should vote one player they think should represent #42.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |