![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,228
|
2006 Draft looks better......
10 Days into the minor league season, the 2006 draft looks a lot better than it did in the offseason.
Previously, you could make a pretty good argument that 3 out of first 4 picks were disapointments. Stubbs hit pretty poorly at Billings Watson was a reliever that was getting hit at Dayton Valakai was great Justin Reed had disapointing GCL. But there were very interesting successes in lower rounds. Now, Stubbs is hitting .357 at Dayton Watson is a starter with a 1.80 Valakia still great at .360 Reed in extended Spring Training. So 3 out of 4 looking good. And most of the interesting successes are still doing well. Dorn (32) and Logan (12) are 2 guys not doing well yet. But Lutz (19) has jumped to AA and has a 1.59 ERA, Kainer (14) is back from Kidney transplant and should start at Billings. Jordan Smith (6) has 1.80 ERA, Justin Turner (7).273, Travis Webb (8) 2.70 ERA, Roenicke (10) has jumped 2 levels and is the closer for Sarasota with 1.59 ERA. Arneson (16) 0.00 ERA, Heisey (17) .348 and 2 catchers Rodriguez (20) .286 and Esquer (24) .308, Louwsma (29) .462 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,742
|
Re: 2006 Draft looks better......
For how bad Parker is hitting, he has an OBP over .353 thanks to a whole bunch of walks.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Smells Like Teen Spirit
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,486
|
Re: 2006 Draft looks better......
As much as I've railed on Stubbs - I would love nothing more to be proved wrong and him to turn out to be a stud. Still a little early, but Buckley had success in Toronto churning out usable players. Never quite had that stud breakout star, but having usable pieces ready for promotion is a huge step in the right direction for the Reds. If they can use that and add in a Jay Bruce from time to time, the system will be looking excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30
|
Re: 2006 Draft looks better......
Even with the small sample size, Stubbs' one extra basehit this year concerns me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West-central Ohio
Posts: 1,912
|
Re: 2006 Draft looks better......
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: 2006 Draft looks better......
small sample size. These guys are old for Low A ball. They are off to a decent start, they need to keep it up and move on.
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
|
Re: 2006 Draft looks better......
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |