RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2007, 12:16 AM   #1
Wheelhouse
Member
 
Wheelhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 2,849
Bo Jackson?

Why does Narron compare Hamilton to Bo Jackson? Jackson was a strikeout machine with poor BA, and his fielding skills were not nearly as refined as Josh's. I see a guy who can steal bases and hit 30HRs, but the comparison ends there...
__________________
"Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself."--Winston Churchill
Wheelhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 05-07-2007, 12:37 AM   #2
RedEye
Ojo Rojo
 
RedEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 5,024
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheelhouse View Post
Why does Narron compare Hamilton to Bo Jackson?
Because Narron doesn't know what he's talking about.
RedEye is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 02:03 AM   #3
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
Re: Bo Jackson?

All about tools.
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 02:53 AM   #4
Eric_Davis
Member
 
Eric_Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,041
Re: Bo Jackson?

Bo Jackson was a freak of nature. Maybe he's referencing Hamilton in that way.
__________________
Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't."
Eric_Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 04:06 AM   #5
redsmetz
Redsmetz
 
redsmetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winton Place
Posts: 10,526
Re: Bo Jackson?

I think the sheer raw natural power. Buck O'Neill talked about Jackson in Ken Burns' series on baseball saying he'd only heard three players whose bats hitting a ball made a distinctive sound when the ball was going out - Babe Ruth, Josh Gibson & Bo Jackson.
redsmetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 04:19 AM   #6
savafan
Maple SERP
 
savafan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,486
Re: Bo Jackson?

The thing about Bo is that we'll never really know how good he could have been. He was continuing to improve as a baseball player each year when he had the hip injury while playing for the Raiders. Sad...
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos.

If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't.
savafan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 04:40 AM   #7
Eric_Davis
Member
 
Eric_Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,041
Re: Bo Jackson?

The thing about Jackson is he proved that you can't play two sports. He wore down every year as the season went on, and though he had great range because of his speed in the outfield he just didn't practice enough and made a zillion errors defensively. He never had phenomenal numbers, just decent ones.

If he hadn't played football, the talent was there to be one of the greatest ever in baseball, but football took a lot of it away, and eventually all of it.
__________________
Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't."
Eric_Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 07:41 AM   #8
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,302
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
The thing about Bo is that we'll never really know how good he could have been. He was continuing to improve as a baseball player each year when he had the hip injury while playing for the Raiders. Sad...
Guess which team he playing against on Jan. 13, 1991 when the hip was injured?

__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 07:56 AM   #9
Redhook
Miami Redhawks
 
Redhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFanAlways1966 View Post
Guess which team he playing against on Jan. 13, 1991 when the hip was injured?

WHO???
















DEY!!
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.
Redhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 07:58 AM   #10
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,302
Re: Bo Jackson?

Bo knows diddly... and so does Redhook!
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 08:02 AM   #11
Redhook
Miami Redhawks
 
Redhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric_Davis View Post
The thing about Jackson is he proved that you can't play two sports. He wore down every year as the season went on, and though he had great range because of his speed in the outfield he just didn't practice enough and made a zillion errors defensively. He never had phenomenal numbers, just decent ones.

If he hadn't played football, the talent was there to be one of the greatest ever in baseball, but football took a lot of it away, and eventually all of it.
I thought he proved you could play two sports. He was a good baseball player, sometimes very good. Baseball wasn't his natural sport though. Football was.

If anything, he should've quit baseball to play football full-time. He was an unbelievable running back and a much, much better football player than baseball player. One of the top 5 running backs I've ever seen. If he was a full-time running back I think he would only be behind Brown, Peyton, and Sanders. He was that good.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.
Redhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 09:15 AM   #12
Chip R
Rally Onion!
 
Chip R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,324
Re: Bo Jackson?

Actually, the comparison was athletically, not as a ballplayer.

"He can be as good as anybody in the game," said Narron, who compares Hamilton's athletic ability to that of Bo Jackson.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160
Chip R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 10:23 AM   #13
Marc D
Member
 
Marc D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,589
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
Actually, the comparison was athletically, not as a ballplayer.

"He can be as good as anybody in the game," said Narron, who compares Hamilton's athletic ability to that of Bo Jackson.

I would agree with that. Bo was the first name that came to mind once I saw Hamilton with my own two eyes.

You can literally see that they are another plane athletically and for me at least thats quite a draw. When a player like that comes along, they just jump off the screen at you and you can't take your eyes off them. The Freel's and Ecksteins of the world just don't have the same entertainment value, even though they are obviously worthy of admiration.

BTW how does one come to the conclusion that Bo showed you can't play both sports? He was an All Star in both, what else did he have to do to prove it? Bo Jackson did show how lame others attempt(cough*Dieon*cough) to play both sports was, I'll give you that.
Marc D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 03:00 PM   #14
Eric_Davis
Member
 
Eric_Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,041
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redhook View Post
I thought he proved you could play two sports. He was a good baseball player, sometimes very good. Baseball wasn't his natural sport though. Football was.

If anything, he should've quit baseball to play football full-time. He was an unbelievable running back and a much, much better football player than baseball player. One of the top 5 running backs I've ever seen. If he was a full-time running back I think he would only be behind Brown, Peyton, and Sanders. He was that good.

I agree with everything but that he proved that you can't play two sports. Instead of being great or "one of the greatest" at one of them, he was only good, sometimes very good at both. He would have been great at whichever sport he would have chosen.
__________________
Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't."
Eric_Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 03:05 PM   #15
Eric_Davis
Member
 
Eric_Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,041
Re: Bo Jackson?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc D View Post
BTW how does one come to the conclusion that Bo showed you can't play both sports? He was an All Star in both, what else did he have to do to prove it? Bo Jackson did show how lame others attempt(cough*Dieon*cough) to play both sports was, I'll give you that.

Very easily. He was an All-Star only once. There's nothing great or even very good about that.

When you look at his splits over his career, he steadily declines as each season wears on. He committed more errors than Jose Canseco.
__________________
Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't."
Eric_Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25