RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-13-2007, 10:25 PM   #1
GOREDSGO32
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

Seriously, when is the last time this organization produced ANYONE from within the system? Homer Bailey seems to be the Reds lone hope. Votto is batting like .240 at Louisville. I mean, just look at the players on the Reds roster, how many came WITHIN the organization? Adam Dunn, is basically it.

- 4 of the 5 starters on the Reds staff came from trades. The 5th spot is a rotating position of, "maybe we'll try this guy this time"

- Bullpen, do we need to go there?

- The starting 9 on the field is a mish mash of free agent signees and guys that couldn't cut it in other organizations, who get hot for a small amount of time here, then give an every day job to. Hatteburgh, Phillips, Hamilton, Ross were all other team's rejects and have done reasonably well here for the most part.

The main question is - if we can have an eye for OTHER teams rejects who get released and perform at least decently here - how come we don't have an eye on who in the heck to draft to produce talent? It appears there is a lot of low ERA guys here at Louisville, but who knows if they can accomplishthat in the majors? 10 hits in 5 1/3 innings from the guy just called up, isn't cutting it. There's only one every day player down here batting over .300.

This is just horrible. There's not a single guy in the Reds bullpen that can get a guy out. Signing free agent pitching rejects is NOT the answer. Invest some of the money in building up the minor leagues, not signing washed up rejects.
  Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 05-13-2007, 10:29 PM   #2
CTA513
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOREDSGO32 View Post
Seriously, when is the last time this organization produced ANYONE from within the system? Homer Bailey seems to be the Reds lone hope. Votto is batting like .240 at Louisville. I mean, just look at the players on the Reds roster, how many came WITHIN the organization? Adam Dunn, is basically it.
Votto is hitting .364 this month after a slow start in his first year with Louisville.
CTA513 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2007, 10:37 PM   #3
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

The Reds suck because the entire organization sucks - top to bottom.

It's been sucking for a while now.

I suggest they consider burning it down and start over to remove said suckiness.

Honestly, I'd have hope, but the infatuation with the Castro's, Coninie's, Cormier's, and Stanton's lead me to believe that there is nothing to be desired at the top.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 12:14 AM   #4
George Anderson
Beer is good!!
 
George Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,118
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOREDSGO32 View Post
- 4 of the 5 starters on the Reds staff came from trades. The 5th spot is a rotating position of, "maybe we'll try this guy this time"
Its alot deeper than that. This organization has not produced a quality starter thru their farm system since Tom Browning, which was well over 20 years ago.

That is beyond pathetic.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard
George Anderson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 12:18 AM   #5
redsupport
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,783
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

wait what about curt lyons or scott scudder
redsupport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 12:20 AM   #6
FlyerFanatic
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 655
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

Did Krivsky not get clear house in our scouting department and bring new people when he came in?
FlyerFanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 01:08 AM   #7
TeamBoone
"Let's Roll"
 
TeamBoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 12,821
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

They trade away all the prospects.
__________________
"Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn
TeamBoone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 06:16 AM   #8
membengal
Member
 
membengal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,379
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

Sigh.

There are plenty of prospects coursing through the system right now. A few are ready to help RIGHT NOW. That they are not here is more of a philosophical issue, than a talent issue.

WK, for better or worse, comes from a franchise that brings its players along in slow (painfully slow) ways. Deference is given to vets (even vets outside the organization) over younger far more talented players in the organization. Sidney Ponson helping to ruin Minnesota's first six weeks this year is only the most recent example. They did this last year too when they kept Liriano from starting until June. They did this with Michael Cuddyer, who spent about five years trying to convince Minny to give him regular at-bats. Like it or not, it's the Minny way. And that is WK's background.

So, please know that Cincy could, immediately, go to Votto at 1b. It could bring up Dumatrait or Bailey. It could bring up bullpen help (there are pitchers down there who certainly would not do worse than Stanton). But WK priortized spending money, and significant money, on vets like Stanton, and Conine, and Castro. And in so doing chose the certainty of those players over the uncertainty of the talent within.

I don't agree with that approach, not when Minny does it, and not here, but it's WK's modus operandi, I think. If you have a beef with anything, it's with that philosophy, NOT with the players in the minors. For my part, as it was last off-season, I would rather lose with the talented kids up and prepare for the future, than scuffle along near .500 with throw-away vets. Now that the throw-away vets are losing? Makes it an even easier choice in my view.
membengal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 09:24 AM   #9
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,611
Re: Bottom line: Reds suck because of an inability to produce prospects

There are a lot of reasons the reds have been bad for the past 5+ seasons. It starts with poor drafting, player development, and trading. They have been cheap and didn't spend too much money but when they do they have stuggled in signing the right players for the right price. You can look over the past 5 years and see that the players being paid the most were some of the worst producers overall. I think now is the time to scrap this current team and system and start anew. I thought they were going to do that with the change in ownership and management but they havn't. I am tired of roll players being signed to be performers while prospects are being promoted very slowly. Guys like Stanton and Conine would be ok if they were the 24 and 25th man not guys who you expected big time results from. Enough with being a poor team, take the hit and build for the future.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25