RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > Game Threads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2007, 01:08 AM   #781
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
Weathers won't be available to pitch for like a week now.
Nah, Weathers will likely be unavailable tomorrow, but add in the off day on Thursday and he'll be available again to pitch by Friday. Despite throwing three full innings, he did only throw 31 pitches and that's a very economical pitch count for nine outs.

Weathers' performance tonight has to be the best relief pitching performance we've seen all season. Kudos to him; the dude got the job done and a heckuva lot more.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 05-16-2007, 01:10 AM   #782
Degenerate39
Senor Votto
 
Degenerate39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclone792 View Post
Weathers' performance tonight has to be the best relief pitching performance we've seen all season. Kudos to him; the dude got the job done and a heckuva lot more.
I agree with that. He moved up a few notches in my book.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player
Degenerate39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:12 AM   #783
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
Massive performance by Weathers. Can't throw enough superlatives at him for what he did tonight.
I think one of those last two would've been gone if the game had been in Cincinnati...

But, despite that, HUGE performance by Weathers + Harang. The kind of outings you need from your best starter and best reliever when the team is going south.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:12 AM   #784
AmarilloRed
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amarillo,Texas
Posts: 3,997
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Good for both of them. Now if the rest of the relievers take Weathers' game to heart, we could possibly salvage this season. This is known as seeing the glass half full.
AmarilloRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:13 AM   #785
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,549
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

It is a shame that a caught spike cost AH the victory. He deserved one tonight.
texasdave is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:15 AM   #786
HumnHilghtFreel
Manliness Personified
 
HumnHilghtFreel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,690
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

lol whoever the AP writer covering the recap for this game on Yahoo must've been in a rush.

Quote:
David Weathers (1-2) pitched two perfect innings and Mike Stanton retired the Padres in order in the 12th to finish off the two-hitter and pick up his first save in two chances.
Either I was watching the wrong thing, or this guy was
HumnHilghtFreel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:22 AM   #787
keeganbrick
Member
 
keeganbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,439
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by HumnHilghtFreel View Post
lol whoever the AP writer covering the recap for this game on Yahoo must've been in a rush.



Either I was watching the wrong thing, or this guy was
What can I say, we all got a little Stanton in us.
__________________
Cincinnati Reds
VOTTO
keeganbrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:57 AM   #788
WVRedsFan
Lime in da Coconut
 
WVRedsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Rainelle, WV
Posts: 7,712
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

I'm sure some people will say that Jerry Narron made all the right moves tonight. And, really, it doesn't matter because we won the game and everyone is happy (and they should be after going 2-9 over the last 11 games), but you have to see what this offense does to the team.

I keep wondering why you bat Conine fourth and Dunn fifth followed by Gonzo. Gonzo has cooled off to .255 (after being well over .300 a week ago) and offers no protection for Dunn. It's easy to pitch around Dunn knowing Alex G will make an out. Why? Why bat Hamilton after Gonzo? he was 3-5 tonight, but his skills are needed at the top of the lineup. There is no reason why Chad Moeller should ever start. Never. Yes, he was 1-3 tonight and scored a run, but no. We are wasting Dunn in this lineup. Bat Jr. third and Dunn fourth. If you must bat Freel leadoff (which I disagree with) then bat Hamilton second and put Phillips fifth or sixth. It's all madness to me.

And with no offensive production, Aaron Harang, just like Arroyo and other starters who have pitched gems this year, gets nothing for his superior outing. Nine innings pitched and two hits. It's just insane.

And for all those who harped on Griffey's "loss of range" in the outfield (which should be copyrighted by those who just can't stand that a sure Hall of Famer can still play), I wish you more losses. For the last three years the mantra of RedsZone has been put anyone out there--Deno, Freel, Hopper, and any number of lesser players. And yet a healthy Griffey still has the ability and the talent to take this team on his shoulders and win a game. Shame on you. Appreciate seeing a player who, despite numerous injuries and setbacks, should always bat third. While your favorites Denorfia and Freel and Hopper and whoever else flail away, The Kid rules.

That is all. I had to get that off my chest. And for those advocating McBeth as the "anointed one" to pitch in this close game, remember he is a rookie. There will be a time for him, but tonight was not the time. Weathers was Superman and Jerry Narron finally made the right decision. I just wish there was a remedial class for lineup construction he could take. In fact, maybe it would be a special ed class.
__________________
www.ris-news.com

"The price of seeking to force our beliefs on others is that someday they might force their beliefs on us."
Mario Cuomo

"You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5."
-Beano Cook
WVRedsFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 02:06 AM   #789
Big Klu
Member
 
Big Klu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cambridge, OH
Posts: 16,274
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
Narron used the same lineup only 22 times last year.

That's just. Wow.
Lou Piniella used 124 different lineups in 1990. He used the following lineup six times--more often than any other:

3B Chris Sabo
CF Billy Hatcher
SS Barry Larkin
LF Eric Davis
RF Paul O'Neill
1B Todd Benzinger
2B Mariano Duncan
C Joe Oliver
<pitcher>




Quote:
Originally Posted by degenerate10 View Post
Freel is in center, Hamilton in left, Castro at 3rd
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamBoone View Post
oh my God... why all these changes? IMHO, stupid changes.

I think he does it just because he can.
Narron burned through his bench like Sherman through Georgia.

Pinch-running Hopper for Dunn was questionable (I wouldn't have done it), but I could live with it, as Hopper is a legitimate stolen base threat. But he should have stayed in the game in LF. Also, Ross should have been double-switched into the #9 spot, so he would have been leading off the 11th. There was no need to use Castro at that point in the game, especially when the Reds only have a five-man bench to begin with. After the top of the 10th, the lineup should have been:

Freel 3b
Phillips 2b
Griffey rf
Conine 1b
Hopper lf (I would have still had Dunn here)
Gonzalez ss
Hamilton cf
Weathers p
Ross c (leads off the 11th inning)

That would have left Valentin and Castro as position players off the bench.




Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
Massive performance by Weathers. Can't throw enough superlatives at him for what he did tonight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor View Post
HUGE performance by Weathers + Harang. The kind of outings you need from your best starter and best reliever when the team is going south.
Agreed. Harang pitched a masterful game (the freak balk in the 8th notwithstanding), and Weathers went totally "old school" with a gutsy three-inning relief outing.
__________________
Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser....Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed...the very idea of losing is hateful to an American.

Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Big Klu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 02:17 AM   #790
Big Klu
Member
 
Big Klu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cambridge, OH
Posts: 16,274
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVRedsFan View Post
I keep wondering why you bat Conine fourth and Dunn fifth followed by Gonzo. Gonzo has cooled off to .255 (after being well over .300 a week ago) and offers no protection for Dunn. It's easy to pitch around Dunn knowing Alex G will make an out. Why? Why bat Hamilton after Gonzo? he was 3-5 tonight, but his skills are needed at the top of the lineup. There is no reason why Chad Moeller should ever start. Never. Yes, he was 1-3 tonight and scored a run, but no. We are wasting Dunn in this lineup. Bat Jr. third and Dunn fourth. If you must bat Freel leadoff (which I disagree with) then bat Hamilton second and put Phillips fifth or sixth. It's all madness to me.
I agree with hitting Griffey and Dunn in the #3-4 spots. How about this lineup:

Hamilton cf
Freel 3b
Griffey rf
Dunn lf
Phillips 2b
Hatteberg/Conine 1b
Gonzalez ss
Ross c
<pitcher>

I didn't mind Moeller playing tonight, because Ross hasn't been too impressive at the plate, and by all accounts Moeller is a good defensive catcher. But I hope he doesn't get too much playing time.
__________________
Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser....Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed...the very idea of losing is hateful to an American.

Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Big Klu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 02:20 AM   #791
Big Klu
Member
 
Big Klu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cambridge, OH
Posts: 16,274
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Congratulations to Ken Griffey Jr., who passed Wally Post and moved into sole possession of tenth place on the Reds' all-time home run list! He now has 571 career homers, and ranks ninth on MLB's HR list.


Updated Reds HR list (players in italics are active):

Reds All-Time Home Run Leaders
1. Johnny Bench - 389
2. Frank Robinson - 324
3. Tony Perez - 287
4. Ted Kluszewski - 251
5. George Foster - 244
6. Adam Dunn - 209
7. Eric Davis - 203
8. Barry Larkin - 198
9. Vada Pinson - 186
10. Ken Griffey, Jr. - 173
11. Wally Post - 172
12. Gus Bell - 160
13. Joe Morgan - 152
13. Pete Rose - 152
15. Lee May - 147
16. Dan Driessen - 133
17. Reggie Sanders - 125
18. Ernie Lombardi - 120
19. Sean Casey - 118
20. Frank McCormick - 110
21. Dave Parker - 107
22. Chris Sabo - 104
23. Dave Concepcion - 101
24. Gordy Coleman - 98
25. Paul O'Neill - 96
__________________
Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser....Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed...the very idea of losing is hateful to an American.

Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Big Klu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:05 AM   #792
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

I love Ken Griffey Junior

...

I love when the Reds win

...

I don't love the way Narron manages this ballclub.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 05:18 AM   #793
redsfan4445
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,732
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

I am soooo happy for Griffey!!! Maybe the bashers will step aside.. because i NEVER gave up on him !!!!!!
redsfan4445 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 06:18 AM   #794
Degenerate39
Senor Votto
 
Degenerate39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by WilyMoROCKS View Post
I love Ken Griffey Junior

...

I love when the Reds win

...

I don't love the way Narron manages this ballclub.
I'm sure we all agree with that. I'm really wondering if Narron knows what he's doing after this game.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player
Degenerate39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 07:03 AM   #795
StillFunkyB
Your killin' me Smalls!
 
StillFunkyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 3,098
Re: 5/15/07 Reds vs. Padres

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Klu View Post
I agree with hitting Griffey and Dunn in the #3-4 spots. How about this lineup:

Hamilton cf
Freel 3b
Griffey rf
Dunn lf
Phillips 2b
Hatteberg/Conine 1b
Gonzalez ss
Ross c
<pitcher>

I didn't mind Moeller playing tonight, because Ross hasn't been too impressive at the plate, and by all accounts Moeller is a good defensive catcher. But I hope he doesn't get too much playing time.
I like the lineup, however without a real legitimate threat to left handed pitchers you might as well bat Hambo, Griff, and Dunn together.
StillFunkyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25