![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,321
|
Revisionist History: Bowden was terrible at drafting players
It's easy to say it now, and I used to defend the man, but it's pretty clear Jim Bowden struggled at best during his time with the Reds when it came to the MLB draft. 1998 looked great for a while with Kearns and Dunn, but that was Bowden's best draft by far and even that one isn't great when you look back on it now.
I wonder if Bowden just had bad luck (injuries to Howington and Gruler, etc.) or if he was truly the most incompetent GM in the history of baseball when it came to the draft. Maybe it's a combination, but I tend to think it's the latter. Dan O'Brien (who was a disaster overall) was here for just two years and he's ALREADY produced much better prospects than Bowden did during his full decade with the team. Not only did Bowden miss on most of his first-round picks, he didn't find many hidden gems in the later rounds. (Not to mention those skanks he used to bring to Dodger games.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Revisionist History: Bowden was terrible at drafting players
During JimBo's time as Reds GM, the team picked the following guys who've had some semblance of a major leaguer career:
Scott Sullivan Paul Bako C.J. Nitkowski Aaron Boone John Riedling Brett Tomko Jason LaRue Ray King Scott Williamson (rookie of the year) Austin Kearns Adam Dunn B.J. Ryan Todd Coffey Ben Broussard Drafted, but not signed were: Chad Allen Kevin Gryboski Rob Mackowiak Terrmel Sledge Jeremy Sowers Guys drafted on Bowden's watch who might yet have major league careers: Joey Votto Chris Denorfia Calvin Medlock Jose Guevara Chris Dickerson His real dog drafts were 1996 and 2001. Hopefully Votto can salvage the 2002 effort. The 1997, 2000 and 2003 drafts didn't pan out well in the final analysis, but they did supply the franchise with some hot properties for a time (though the franchise never got much return on those hot properties). The real big problem is the franchise to date has gotten nothing from his final four drafts. You can make the case that he did all right fom 1993-99 (all the guys on the major league list above come from those drafts).
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Coatesville, PA
Posts: 236
|
Re: Revisionist History: Bowden was terrible at drafting players
I think Bowden drafted Nick Markakis in 2001 also, but he did not sign
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Revisionist History: Bowden was terrible at drafting players
Yep, forgot to include him.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,053
|
Re: Revisionist History: Bowden was terrible at drafting players
Rich Gardner would still be in the potential major league careers category, I hope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,410
|
Re: Revisionist History: Bowden was terrible at drafting players
IIRC, Marge Schott significantly downsized the scouting department. That doesn't give the GM much of a chance when it comes to the draft.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |