![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,372
|
Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
This is not rational, logical, or reasonable, but something about tonight's (Wednesday's) game and the manager's recent handling of the bullpen makes me unaccountably optimistic about the rest of the season.
The optimism began with Keppinger's base-clearing double and grew from there. Had it been a superstar getting those 3 RBI, that would have been one thig, but Kepp has been McCanin's #3 SS. Then, in the ninth, with Freel at second, Phillips at shortstop (the Skip's #4 SS), Conine at third, and Weathers in for a second inning, it got the old Far East juices stirring. The Reds have won several series under the new skipper, have shown that they can play with the front runners, and they are 19-23 vs Central Division teams (with a whopping 11 of their 59 losses coming to American League teams). Admittedly this is an emotional reaction, and there are a bunch of Central teams in the way, but if this were a little earlier in July instead of late July, I'd be advocating that the Reds be buyers, not sellers. Just what currency they would use to be buyers I don't know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,085
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
No....no way......not even a thought should be entered into thinking this team can be a buyer and can seriously contend.
Did you see how bad they played in FLA against that team? More bullpen arms that are no better than what they have...and you trade prospects to get them? Forget it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Sell sell sell, play for next year
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
The Reds would have to be on fire for the rest of the season just to make .500. This team is not, nor will it be, in contention this season.
That said, if all the buyers are trying to lowball you, it might make sense to become a buyer too and outdo their paltry bids. Maybe you can snatch up a Javier Vazquez in the process.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 4,393
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Quote:
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,372
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
More of the same today (Thursday), seeing Keppinger's based loaded hit, Hopper's PH, Valentin's game winner, Livingston's quality start (and hitting the ball still), and Burton's perfect inning -- all from guys about whom many have had low expectations.
Couple that with impending help anticipated from Gonzalez, Hamilton, Guardado, and perhaps Bray and Bailey, I feel that the Reds are becomming as good as any other Central team. Biggest question is: how many games remain? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 3,440
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Hey Yankees want Weathers - we need to grab Mariano.
__________________
And This One Belongs to the REDS!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,821
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Call it buying, selling, whatever. The Reds need two or three starting pitchers and two or three very good relievers. I hope they have a plan for getting these people, or they will be out of it next July again.
I'm open to any approach that brings quality pitching to this team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,111
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Quote:
The Reds are currently 44-59 (103 games) with a win pct. of .427. The have 59 games left. To get to .500 (81-81), they would need to win 37 out of 59 games which is a .627 winning pct. To get to 90 games (a guesstimate to win the division), they would need to win 45 out of 59 games which is a .762 winning pct. .500 would be a monumental accomplishment. Nothing is impossible, but 90 wins for this ballclub is as close to impossible as you can get.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." Last edited by Roy Tucker; 07-26-2007 at 05:47 PM. Reason: I can't subtract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 3,440
|
Re: Should the Reds be buyers and not sellers???
Quote:
Hatteberg - Been just awesome Hamilton - When healthy many had him fighting for ROY Griffey - enough said - what a year Dunn - 43 HR 110 RBI projected season Phillips - just awesome - one of the top 2B Ross - leading catchers in HRs and nice RBI production for that BA and hitting 8th (not counting awesome defense) The struggles are the timely hitting and the right handed bats thump ala EE. Pitching is another story, but with Harang, Arroyo, and at home Kyle Loshe there is something there. Homer on the farm, with LIvingston much better than Milton, and Burton, Stormy Weathers. It's not all bad. I know it's time to be negative, but I still say the team is playing pretty darn good and in most ballgames. The ball hasn't been bouncing their way. Have to mention Hopper and Javy too! They've had some nice moments this year. Who's this Kepplinger dude too!
__________________
And This One Belongs to the REDS!!! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |