Innings scored on and Big Innings

[texasdave]

Just a little something to do while waiting for the rain delay to end.

This chart has four columns:

ISO% - Innings Scored On percentage - the number of innings in which the opposition scored a run divided by the number of innings the pitcher appeared in. Therefore if a pitcher came out for an inning that is counted whether he retired a batter or not.

BI% - Big Inning percentage - this is the number of innings in which the pitcher gave up 3 or more runs divided by the number of innings the pitcher appeared in.

ERA - listed for informational purposes.

Starts - Ditto.

Pitcher	IS0%	Pitcher	BI%	Pitcher	ERA	Pitcher	STARTS
Harang	25.5%	Lvngstn	0.0%	Harang	3.45	Harang	22
Lohse	29.2%	Harang	3.9%	Lvngstn	3.72	Arroyo	21
Arroyo	29.4%	Belisle	5.0%	Arroyo	4.58	Lohse	21
Lvngstn	32.3%	Arroyo	5.9%	Lohse	4.58	Belisle	20
Belisle	37.2%	Milton	6.1%	Milton	5.17	Milton	6
Milton	42.4%	Bailey	6.7%	Belisle	5.28	Bailey	6
Srloos	42.9%	Lohse	7.3%	Bailey	6.99	Lvngstn	5
Bailey	43.3%	Srloos	14.3%	Srloos	13.50	Srloos	2

Aaron Harang is scored upon about every four innings and has been very successful at limiting big innings. Basically he has been the man.

Lohse and Arroyo have the same ERA to date. They have given up runs in about the same amount of innings, but Lohse has had many more big innings. I was surprised that his ERA isn't higher than Arroyo's.

Livingston is scored upon roughly every third inning. Remarkably, in five starts he has yet to succumb to a big inning. Pretty impressive for a young pitcher. This seems to indicate he isn't easily rattled.

Belisle is touched up fairly frequently but also seems to be able to limit somewhat big innings. I hope this bodes well for his future development.

Milton, Saarloos and Bailey have had their troubles across the board. Bailey has the excuse of youth; the other two not so much.

***Note*** Runs considered were both earned and unearned.

[durl]

Good stats.

I'd like to see something similar for relievers...especially when it comes to the "big inning."

Has anyone seen stats on the number of runs each team has given up by inning this year? I'm guessing that there's no one even close to what the Reds have allowed.

[Muggerd]

Originally Posted by texasdave

Just a little something to do while waiting for the rain delay to end.

This chart has four columns:

ISO% - Innings Scored On percentage - the number of innings in which the opposition scored a run divided by the number of innings the pitcher appeared in. Therefore if a pitcher came out for an inning that is counted whether he retired a batter or not.

BI% - Big Inning percentage - this is the number of innings in which the pitcher gave up 3 or more runs divided by the number of innings the pitcher appeared in.

ERA - listed for informational purposes.

Starts - Ditto.

Pitcher	IS0%	Pitcher	BI%	Pitcher	ERA	Pitcher	STARTS
Harang	25.5%	Lvngstn	0.0%	Harang	3.45	Harang	22
Lohse	29.2%	Harang	3.9%	Lvngstn	3.72	Arroyo	21
Arroyo	29.4%	Belisle	5.0%	Arroyo	4.58	Lohse	21
Lvngstn	32.3%	Arroyo	5.9%	Lohse	4.58	Belisle	20
Belisle	37.2%	Milton	6.1%	Milton	5.17	Milton	6
Milton	42.4%	Bailey	6.7%	Belisle	5.28	Bailey	6
Srloos	42.9%	Lohse	7.3%	Bailey	6.99	Lvngstn	5
Bailey	43.3%	Srloos	14.3%	Srloos	13.50	Srloos	2

Aaron Harang is scored upon about every four innings and has been very successful at limiting big innings. Basically he has been the man.

Lohse and Arroyo have the same ERA to date. They have given up runs in about the same amount of innings, but Lohse has had many more big innings. I was surprised that his ERA isn't higher than Arroyo's.

Livingston is scored upon roughly every third inning. Remarkably, in five starts he has yet to succumb to a big inning. Pretty impressive for a young pitcher. This seems to indicate he isn't easily rattled.

Belisle is touched up fairly frequently but also seems to be able to limit somewhat big innings. I hope this bodes well for his future development.

Milton, Saarloos and Bailey have had their troubles across the board. Bailey has the excuse of youth; the other two not so much.

***Note*** Runs considered were both earned and unearned.

This post is pretty much proof that a consistency is something the stats dont normally show. I absolutely love this post :o