RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2007, 03:57 PM   #1
WVRed
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
 
WVRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
Media coverage of Bonds breaking record

I know there is a thread for Bonds breaking the record, but I thought this one deserved its own thread.

I woke up to watch ESPN News this morning before I took off for work, needless to say, the whole HALF HOUR was dedicated to nothing but Barry Lamar Bonds. They did show at one point box scores from other games, but was this really necessary?

Not sure about Sportscenter and their coverage, but to take a whole half hour of the morning and dedicate it to nothing more than Barry Bonds really shows the emphasis that is placed on certain athletes and records. I don't even think this was as big a deal as when he broke the single season record.

Anybody else notice?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
I've read books about sparkling vampires who walk around in the daylight that were written better than a John Fay article.
WVRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 08-08-2007, 03:59 PM   #2
Matt700wlw
Making sense of it all
 
Matt700wlw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,130
Re: Media coverage of Bonds breaking record

I noticed his oldest daughter is quite attractive....I don't know how old she is, though

__________________
An excited shade of Red
Matt700wlw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:00 PM   #3
MrCinatit
Baseball card addict
 
MrCinatit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Piqua
Posts: 4,426
Re: Media coverage of Bonds breaking record

To be honest, I am not sure.
Had someone more personable broken the record, even more attention and coverage might have been given.
Yes, there was quite the hype, but too many - myself included - were stuck in "I could care less, let's focus on baseball" mode. Had it been Junior, for instance, I would have been disappointed with a half hour's coverage.
__________________
whisper words of wisdom
I wrote a book!

My AmazonShort

My other AmazonShort
MrCinatit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:06 PM   #4
StillFunkyB
Your killin' me Smalls!
 
StillFunkyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 3,098
Re: Media coverage of Bonds breaking record

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVRed View Post
I know there is a thread for Bonds breaking the record, but I thought this one deserved its own thread.

I woke up to watch ESPN News this morning before I took off for work, needless to say, the whole HALF HOUR was dedicated to nothing but Barry Lamar Bonds. They did show at one point box scores from other games, but was this really necessary?

Not sure about Sportscenter and their coverage, but to take a whole half hour of the morning and dedicate it to nothing more than Barry Bonds really shows the emphasis that is placed on certain athletes and records. I don't even think this was as big a deal as when he broke the single season record.

Anybody else notice?
He is only the third guy to hit over 700 homeruns in a game that is over a hundred years old, and you don't think that it's important? I'm confused. Personal feelings for him aside, it's a big news story.
StillFunkyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:56 PM   #5
redsfan30
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,545
Re: Media coverage of Bonds breaking record

This absolutely deserves the coverage it's gotten. Like him or not, this is nothing to sneeze at.

And as Matt mentioned, Barry's oldest daughter is quite attractive.
__________________
"Strickland Propane... Taste the meat, not the heat." - Hank Hill
redsfan30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 06:16 AM   #6
WVRed
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
 
WVRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
Re: Media coverage of Bonds breaking record

Quote:
Originally Posted by StillFunkyB View Post
He is only the third guy to hit over 700 homeruns in a game that is over a hundred years old, and you don't think that it's important? I'm confused. Personal feelings for him aside, it's a big news story.
Is it worth devoting a whole morning to though? I mean, it should definitely be the lead story with a big follow-up, but to devote the entire half hour especially when there are other games and sports to carry, isn't that a bit much?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
I've read books about sparkling vampires who walk around in the daylight that were written better than a John Fay article.
WVRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25