![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,130
|
Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
TRANSACTIONS: Prior to this afternoon's game the Reds optioned to Louisville RHP Matt Belisle and recalled from Louisville LHP Bill Bray (#45)...in last night's 11-inning, 12-7 loss vs SD the Reds used every pitcher in the bullpen...with Mon's off day, the Reds won't need a fifth starter until 8/18
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,628
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Who will start in his place? Santos?
Something had to be done with Belisle. He just hasn't put it together and he's had a lot of chances this year (I believe he's given up the 2nd most HRs of any starting pitcher). I would've preferred seeing him go to the bullpen (which over a long period of time is a place I think he could be effective), but hard to fault this move. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Belisle has his uses, but has been reliably awful for some time now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Bray returns, we will never lose again
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,130
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Guardado and Bray are back....now we see what a mad genius Wayne Krivsky really is
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
So has a bunch of other guys out there, I'd rather keep seeing Belisle
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,681
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Interesting move but not one to complain much about. Glad to see Bray up and I want to see him pitching in Cincy until he completely fails. Hopefully he doesn't fail and becomes a reliable option in the pen for the next few years.
As for Belisle, the Reds pretty much know what they have by now and know that he's an ok (as in it could be a lot worse) fallback option in the 4 or 5 spot if no one better emerges. The Reds seem to be long on fallback options and short on guys emerging these days. I'm sure that options had something to do with this. I still hold out hope that over the next few days that Stanton and his 2008 albatross deal can be moved to a desperate contender to make a roster spot for the eventual recall of a starter. Atlanta could be an option with Dotel now out.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,702
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
So we don't have a fifth starter right now?
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Merely more roster jockeying by Wayne, Matt will be back up when he is eligible.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,667
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Wow. Before it was Harang, Arroyo, pray for rain or an OK Belisle. Now it is AH, BA, and definitely pray for rain. Swell.
I do like Bray being up though. A pen next year of... Bray Coot Burton Salmon Stormy McBeth Stanton/Maj/Coffey/Belisle (long man)/Santos (long)/Gosling (Loogy?) That isn't too bad is it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Lime in da Coconut
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Rainelle, WV
Posts: 7,711
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,457
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
This better be a short term move.
For all of Belisle's faults, he is still easily the Reds' 3rd best option right now. It's not close. He's a decent back of the rotation option IMO, and just needs more time. If the Reds are expecting better results out of Dumatrait and the rest, then they are not going to be very happy. Also I hope a switch to the bullpen is not being thought about. That only makes sense if you have 3-4 better options ready to step in. As it stands, the Reds don't have the starting pitching to not give him a longer chance. Last edited by Patrick Bateman; 08-11-2007 at 03:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,703
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Belisle has a DIPS ERA of 4.58.
That's about average for a #3 starter, and certainly better than what any of our other candidates will do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,457
|
Re: Bill Bray up...Matt Belisle down
Quote:
I'm not saying he's Cy Young. But he is pretty young, cheap, and half way decent. That's an attractive package to a small market team like the Reds. He's a guy I'd like to see in the 4/5th slot in the rotation for the next 2-3 seasons. If they could find better pitchers I would have no problem with switching Belisle's roles and sending him down, but there are no better options. The Reds need to know that in GABP, with an awful defense, that pitchers numbers are going to get ugly sometimes. Given time, I think Belisle would show people that he can stick at the back of the rotation. The Reds don't have the starting options to dick around with Belisle. Last edited by Patrick Bateman; 08-11-2007 at 03:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |