|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which set of prospects would you rather have? | |||
| I like the new prospects. |
   
|
19 | 95.00% |
| I want the old prospects back. |
  
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-18-2007, 03:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Which Set of Prospects Would You Rather Have?
Below is a list of the rookies the Reds have gained/lost during Wayne Krivsky's tenure (not including Minor League free agents). Obviously, some of them are no longer rookies, but they were at the times of the transactions. Based on Major League statistics, the Reds, have clearly gotten the better end of Wayne Krivsky's trades (thanks to Brandon Phillips, Bronson Arroyo, etc.). However, what I'm wondering is if the Reds have gotten the better end of the deals on the Minor League side, as well.
PROSPECTS ACQUIRED THROUGH RULE 5, TRADE, AND WAIVERS 1. Bill Bray 2. Jared Burton 3. Jon Coutlangus 4. Shaun Cumberland 5. Jerry Gil 6. Ben Jukich 7. Bobby Livingston 8. Pedro Lopez 9. Marcus McBeth 10. Matt Maloney 11. Robert Manuel 12. Alex Smit 13. Daryl Thompson PROSPECTS DEPARTED THROUGH RULE 5, TRADE, AND WAIVERS 1. Bobby Basham 2. Travis Chick 3. Kyle Edens 4. Justin Germano 5. Russ Haltiwanger 6. Brendan Harris 7. Brad Key 8. Ben Kozlowski 9. Travis Lawhorn 10. Calvin Medlock 11. Javon Moran 12. Brandon Roberts 13. Cody Ross 14. David Shafer 15. Jeff Stevens 16. Zac Stott 17. Zach Ward 18. Brandon Watson 19. Abe Woody
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587 http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg |
|
|
|
08-18-2007, 03:42 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Which Set of Prospects Would You Rather Have?
I have to go with the first list. Bray, Burton, Coutlangus, and possibly McBeth will help the bullpen out when they've all matured. I like Livingston in the rotation but chances are he won't be there in the future. Mat Maloney is becoming a pleasant surprise and I'm looking forward to seeing him in the Majors. I liked Lopez I thought he would be a good bench player and then he got hit in the face.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
08-18-2007, 03:54 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Which Set of Prospects Would You Rather Have?
Off the top of my head, Germano, Harris and Ross would be the only 3 I somewhat miss.
Keppinger = Harris, so we're fine there. Ross > Hopper, so that one doesn't work for us. Germano > Livingston (only guy I saw that is in a similar P role), so we lost that one as well. Based on this quick math/logic, we possibly came out ahead based on the collective sum of Bray, Burton, Coutlangus and McBeth > Germano, Ross and Harris. |
|
|
|
|
08-18-2007, 04:48 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
|
Re: Which Set of Prospects Would You Rather Have?
I'd take Bray or Burton over having every player on the other list.
It's not even close. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Linear Mode
