![]() |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 127
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Bob Brenly wins too and at least he's won a championship. If the Reds want to hire a proven winner Id take Brenly before Baker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Centerville,OH
Posts: 635
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
How many World Series rings does he have as a manager?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
I guess, but you're pretty much asking him to change his fundamental philiosophy on how baseball works.
BTW, while he was doing all that winning - yet never once getting a ring - Wood and Prior, who were two of the most promising young pitchers of their generation, became afterthoughts. I just don't trust him managing Bailey and Cueto. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Thank God Steves Gone
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 59
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Even if he sucks the Reds will finally get some attention with him at the helm. Because you know how much ESPN loves Dusty.
__________________
In This Man I Trust .. A Little Bit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
I never thought there could be something to make me give up rooting for the Reds, but if they hired Dusty... well, that might be the only decision that would make me re-think that stand long and hard...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: way-east of cincinnati
Posts: 1,158
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
If Pete isn't considered, Brenly has my vote. He has expressed interest in the job, and he won a championship with nothing more than a decent team. I would think he can handle the all important task of controlling the clubhouse. I really can't see Baker as a Krivsky kind of guy. Rather polar opposite approaches, don't you think? Krivsky=cautious. Baker=run 'em till they drop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Quote:
just let me know... PEACE -BLEEDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Don't forget Brenly batted the godawful Tony Womack lead-off for the better part of 2 seasons because he was "fast."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,182
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Dusty Baker Destroyer of all arms
__________________
The Hunt for a Reds October. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | ||
|
The Future
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,462
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: WEST CARROLLTON OHIO
Posts: 1,229
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
Who did Dusty destroy in Frisco?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Recovering Cubs Fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 711
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
If the Reds hire Dusty Baker, then I will finally know that there is indeed a God.
And I will know that God hates me and doesn't want me to watch baseball anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,344
|
Re: Reds may favor Baker
I think its wrong to blame Dusty Baker for Mark Prior's arm injuries:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Prior#Injuries Preseason injuries, freak injuries, batting practice injuries. Not really much Dusty could do about that. I also think Kerry Wood's injuries are mainly attributable to poor mechanics.
__________________
FIRE DUSTY BAKER ADOPT THIS SIGNATURE IN SOLIDARITY!!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |