RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2007, 11:52 AM   #1
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,417
Twins targeting Hamilton?

According to www.mlbtraderumors.com, Josh Hamilton is one of a very small number of players that would be high on the Twinkies wish list in a deal for Johan Santana!

What would the other parts have to be? Because the Twins are one of the only teams in baseball that is not hot after pitching, I really think they would be a great matchup for the Reds. They are also supposedly hot after Scott Hatteberg, who would fill their DH role. Could a deal of Hamilton, Hatteberg, and any pitcher not named Bailey or Cueto be enough for Santana? Probably not, but I bet it could fetch Matt Garza seeing as who they are players the Twins highly covet. Very interesting, stay tuned...
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-11-2007, 11:56 AM   #2
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,816
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

The site says "random speculation". If that speculation is correct, I would start with Hamilton/Garza discussions and go from there. I think Hamilton/Santana would take a whole lot more than just Hamilton.
edabbs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 11:57 AM   #3
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,917
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

From mlbtraderumors.com:
Quote:
Random speculation on players the Twins might covet for Santana: Josh Hamilton, Chris Young of Arizona, Jacoby Ellsbury, Delmon Young, Carlos Gomez, or Garrett Atkins.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 12:00 PM   #4
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Interesting dichotomy... "mlbtraderumors.com" and "random speculation."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 12:00 PM   #5
NJReds
Member
 
NJReds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,408
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

The only way that happens, IMO, is in a 3-way deal. I can't see the Reds dealing for Santana, or signing him long term.
__________________
"The players make the manager, it's never the other way." - Sparky Anderson
NJReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 12:05 PM   #6
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

The twins are lefty heavy already. My guess if if they're going for a power bat, it will need to be a righty.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 01:01 PM   #7
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,331
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM View Post
The twins are lefty heavy already. My guess if if they're going for a power bat, it will need to be a righty.
The Twins have so little in terms of actual major league caliber hitters, never mind power hitters, that I doubt they're that picky about handedness. I would think their starting offense, as it consists right now, would be: Mauer(L), Morneau(L), Kubel(L), Cuddyer(R), Bartlett(R), Casilla(S), and 3 blanks. They do tend to give Mauer and Morneau turns at DH as rest, so maybe they'd prefer a backup catcher or 1st baseman who can hit to a real full-time DH, but they really do need 3 more real hitters to play 3rd, CF, and other. And if they could upgrade either corner outfield spot, I think they'd do that, too. Which is a really long way of saying, almost anyone who can hit at all could be an upgrade for them somewhere.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 01:21 PM   #8
Strikes Out Looking
Member
 
Strikes Out Looking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,266
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

For what it's worth, I'd trade Hamilton for Santana.
Strikes Out Looking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 01:53 PM   #9
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strikes Out Looking View Post
For what it's worth, I'd trade Hamilton for Santana.
Question is, what else do they want with Hammy.
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:00 PM   #10
reds44
#TheReturn
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,660
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Random speculation on players the Twins might covet for Santana: Josh Hamilton, Chris Young of Arizona, Jacoby Ellsbury, Delmon Young, Carlos Gomez, or Garrett Atkins.

Key words.
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:06 PM   #11
buckeyenut
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,721
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Actually, I think Santana might be easier to get than Garza. And I am not so sure that something like Hamilton, Hatteberg, Maloney and Stubbs might not get us in the ballpark assuming MIN wants bats back rather than pitching in general because they feel they have the high end pitching prospects who need playing time to replace Santana with.

And if I am the Reds, I pull the trigger on that deal without talking extension and talk longterm deal with him when he gets here or deal him at the deadline. We need pitching more than MIN so a flip there might be good for both of us. It would be far easier to give up a Phillip Hughes if you were getting a Santana, but MIN doesn't need Hughes, they need bats.
buckeyenut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:07 PM   #12
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,711
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Gazra would be a better fit for us than 1 year of Santana.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:31 PM   #13
RANDY IN INDY
Matt's Dad
 
RANDY IN INDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 14,502
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Gazra would be a better fit for us than 1 year of Santana.
Totally agree.
__________________
Talent is God Given: be humble.
Fame is man given: be thankful.
Conceit is self given: be careful.

John Wooden
RANDY IN INDY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:43 PM   #14
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,130
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

For all any of us know, Random Speculation could mean someone is reading the ideas thrown around here.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:46 PM   #15
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,581
Re: Twins targeting Hamilton?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Gazra would be a better fit for us than 1 year of Santana.
Griffey comes off the books next year. The Reds could pony up if they are serious about winning.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25