![]() |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Smells Like Teen Spirit
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,486
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
And he's now cheap enough that he'll earn less that Matt Morris (the Pirates stud 4th starter) will, and probably make you want to vomit less while watching him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
And my argument is that the Pirates are better off holding open tryouts in the #5 spot than signing Kyle Lohse. Of course, I'm also assuming the Pirates have/can find a few high-ceiling pitchers to throw out there. Those FA's you are talking about will want to join the team if it is better, and holding open tryouts would be the best way to improve...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
As for the vomiting, I can deal with it for a season or two if it will bring me a good team down the line...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
And isn't rushing pitchers that are not ready the best way to ensure that they never succeed? If I was a Pittsburgh fan and the GM did what you're suggesting I'd be livid.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
It sounds like you would rather win 75 games instead of 65 in 2008 and 2009 as if it makes a difference. I don't see how doing that increases the Pirates chances of winning in 2010 and beyond. Play the youngsters...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
I know nobody on RZ wants to admit it but major league veteran pitchers like Lohse have value, even if your team isn't ready to compete. Throwing poop against the wall and hoping it turns into chocolate just isn't a plan IMO.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
The Pirates have little in the way of tradeable commodities, though they do have some interesting commodities. I'd probably try the following:
Prospecting for Gold (and Black) 1) Deal one of the two offensive catchers they have. Both Paulino and Doumit are solid offensively, and Paulino has his days defensively as well. Doumit is similiar to an early LAD Piazza, not the statue he became as a Marlin and Met. Paulino is much better behind the plate and has some pop. I'd deal Paulino and hope Doumit establishes himself as an offensive force at C. It's certainly possible. 2) Deal SS Jack Wilson. Wilson has a reputation for defensive excellence and hit well in 07. He should have some value, but his contract might mitigate some of that. Prospect Brian Bixler looks to be a solid everyday player, with some limited offensive OBP value. He'd be a fine lower order hitter. Sign 'Em Up 1) The Pirates need some serious buzz, as the fan base is less than thrilled at the futility of the past fifteen years or so. So, why not sign Barry Bonds? Plug him in LF, slide Jason Bay to RF, while McLouth, Morgan, and Duffy fight over CF. Bonds instantly makes the lineup more solid, and, with Xavier Nady as a fourth OF, when he gets hurt, the lose a lot, but not as much as you'd think. 2) Pittsburgh's starting rotation isn't that bad, as Matt Morris is a solid #3 behind Ian Snell and Tom Gorzellany. That said, neither Paul Maholm nor Zach Duke set the world on fire last season, so another free agent might make sense. Why not Jeff Weaver? He'd be cheap, he's an innings eater, and the switch to the National League might appeal to the former Cardinal. If not, Kyle Lohse is still available, as is Josh Fogg. Any of them might appeal as a fourth or fifth starter. Wither Duke or Maholm? I'd make Duke a reliever. Try him as a set-up guy this year, with an eye toward closing in the secong part of the season. (I'd deal Matt Capps at the Trading Deadline for a king's ransom.) Maholm, as a LHP, is alright learning on the job as either the fourth or fifth starter. Now Batting... Nate McLouth CF Had a quiet 800 OPS last season and plays a solid center field. He'll have to, between Bonds and Bay. Freddie Sanchez 2B A rare find, after the Pirates sent him all over the IF for two years. He hits well and showed some surprising pop in 07. Jason Bay RF He'll hit better than he did last season, especially in front of Barry. Barry Bonds LF The Prodigal Son returneth. Pirates fan rejoiceth. Until the jury comes back. Ryan Doumit C LaRoche could hit here, but Doumit's a switch hitter, so that makes him the better choice. Could become the big sleeper of 08. Adam LaRoche 1B Overcame slow start to hit okay in 08. Good with the leather. Neil Walker 3B Questionable prospect could hit well and could fall flat on his face. Bautista is there if he fails. Brian Bixler SS Prospect with decent OBP skills. He's cheap and capable. now Pitching... Ian Snell The closest thing the Pirates have had to an ace since Doug Drabek? Tom Gorzallenny Really good, really underrated season in 07. Could blossom into Aaron Harang-style ace this season. Matt Morris Expensive, not worth the contract, but a good, dependable #3 starter, which is more than most can say in this division. Jeff Weaver/ Kyle Lohse/ Josh Fogg Free agent acquisition allows Duke to play set-up man and provides needed depth, as none of the draft picks have shown a propensity for adequacy. Paul Maholm/ Zach Duke Either/ or fifth starter. I'm going with the southpaw witht he added innings pitched. He's able to throw a ton of innings, but probably won't be much more than a league average hurler at best. Last edited by Scrap Irony; 02-18-2008 at 10:09 PM. Reason: fixed silly LH fifth starter question |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Both Duke and Maholm are LH... and I don't see Duke being much out of the bullpen. Also, if you are willing to use Xavier Nady as a fourth outfielder, you might as well trade him and try to get some youngsters in return...
On the whole, your plan sounds pretty good Scrap Iron
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
I meant to add "with the added innings pitched" after southpaw, but got in too big a hurry. (Now fixed in original post)I think Duke would be an excellent LOOGY at worst and a possible closer at best. As a starter, eh...
I keep Nady because he's got some pop, he's not too old, and both Bonds and Bay have injury histories. Too, he can play 1B. Add all that and he's still looking at 450-500 AB in a season, if managed properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,912
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Here's what Neil Huntington has done, in his own words:
Quote:
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
I believe this is what many RedsZoner's wish Krivsky did with the public-not saying it's good or bad...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,912
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
That said, we're far enough down the road at this point that his plan is become increasingly evident through his actions.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
|
Re: GM Project 2007 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Quote:
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |