RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2007, 01:40 PM   #46
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,381
Re: Reds after Cordero

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
As you're fond of pointing out, the offseason's just begun. And the Cards have many chips.
Too bad most of their chips are dollar ones.
westofyou is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-23-2007, 01:47 PM   #47
reds44
#TheReturn
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,668
Re: Reds after Cordero

As long as the money is not that absurd, this is something you have to be in favor of. Getting a shut down closer would set up the bullpen so nicely. Bray as the lefty/6 inning guy, Burton in the 7th, Weathers in the 8th, Cordero in the 9th. The bullpen is so much easier to set up when you know you have a shut down guy behind it. He may cost alot of money, but the bullpen is bad and he would be an upgrade.

Get Cordero, go out at trade or sign for a starting pitcher, and you take a huge step toward competing in the central.
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 01:48 PM   #48
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,823
Re: Reds after Cordero

When I first read the opening post, I thought the Reds were talking 4 years, $42 million. But now I just realized that those figures were what Milwaukee offered him.

Wow...I really hope this isn't the only move, as that's a lot of green to throw at a closer.

To me, money like that for a closer should be for contending teams. You don't need a closer when you don't have a lead. Hopefully this isn't it, if it happens at all.
edabbs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 01:49 PM   #49
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Reds after Cordero

My overall take on the Cordero deal is that I'm fine with it if it's just the bellwether move. However, if it's the sum total, it's a horrible, horrible deal. Because it means the team has maxed itself out on a reliever.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 01:51 PM   #50
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,381
Re: Reds after Cordero

Quote:
You don't need a closer when you don't have a lead.
Do you need one when you are 29th out of 30 teams in save percentage?
westofyou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 01:51 PM   #51
reds44
#TheReturn
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,668
Re: Reds after Cordero

Quote:
Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
When I first read the opening post, I thought the Reds were talking 4 years, $42 million. But now I just realized that those figures were what Milwaukee offered him.

Wow...I really hope this isn't the only move, as that's a lot of green to throw at a closer.

To me, money like that for a closer should be for contending teams. You don't need a closer when you don't have a lead. Hopefully this isn't it, if it happens at all.
The Reds problem really wasn't getting a lead or keeping the lead in the 9th last year, it was getting the lead from the starter to Weathers. Cordero would bump both Weathers and Burton back a spot, and help do that.

The Reds were way at the bottomg of the league in save percentage last year because of all the blown leads by the bullpen in the middle innings.
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 01:53 PM   #52
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Reds after Cordero

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
The Reds problem really wasn't getting a lead or keeping the lead in the 9th last year, it was getting the lead from the starter to Weathers. Cordero would bump both Weathers and Burton back a spot, and help do that.

The Reds were way at the bottomg of the league in save percentage last year because of all the blown leads by the bullpen in the middle innings.
The Reds problem was a LOT of things. Sure, the bullpen failures magnify the problem because of the timing of the blown leads, but don't kid yourself, the Reds' pitching woes began in the first inning and continued till the final out was recorded. Just an awful, awful pitching corps last season.

Still and all, I seriously doubt this deal goes down. That would be an uprecedented figure for the Reds to throw at a pitcher, much less a reliever. And the Reds aren't about the breaking of precedent.

Last edited by Falls City Beer; 11-23-2007 at 01:56 PM.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 01:55 PM   #53
reds44
#TheReturn
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,668
Re: Reds after Cordero

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
The Reds problem was a LOT of things. Sure, the bullpen failures magnify the problem because of the timing of the blown leads, but don't kid yourself, the Reds' pitching woes began in the first inning and continued till the final out was recorded. Just an awful, awful pitching corps last season.
Which is why I said they will still need to acquire another starting pitcher.
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:00 PM   #54
REDREAD
Where's my chair?
 
REDREAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,802
Re: Reds after Cordero

I'd like it if the Reds signed Cordero.

Sure, all relief pitchers are risky.

10 million/year isn't too much, when put in perspective.. I mean, Stanton and Weathers combine for around 6-7 million next year, and they are a much bigger crapshoot.

My main beef with the Reds' FA signings last year is that they spent all their money on spare parts, as opposed to guys that could actually make a difference. IMO, Cordero is a guy that could actually make a difference.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013!

Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
REDREAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:01 PM   #55
deltachi8
smells of rich mahogany
 
deltachi8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,001
Re: Reds after Cordero

I like this move if it is paired with another mover for a starter. I dont think spending$10M on a closer when you don't have the other pieces to compete is wise. However, get another legitimate starter and you go along way towards competing.
__________________
Nothing to see here. Please disperse.
deltachi8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:05 PM   #56
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,659
Re: Reds after Cordero

Sign Cordero and then pull off a Hamilton-for-Garza type trade and this team could be ready to win the NL Central.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:06 PM   #57
Tom Servo
thirsty and miserable
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,413
Re: Reds after Cordero

Here's rotoworld's take on it:

Quote:
The Reds are involved in serious talks with free agent Francisco Cordero, FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal reports.

Spending 15 percent of the team's budget on a guy who will throw five percent of the innings hardly seems like a good idea, but the Reds do need the relief help, possibly even more than they could use another starter. Cordero is likely to command a four-year deal in excess of $40 million. The Brewers are already in that territory, Rosenthal says.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."
Tom Servo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:07 PM   #58
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Reds after Cordero

To me the likelihood of a Hamilton for Garza deal is roughly nil. My guess is it would take EdE, Hamilton, and a minor prospect.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:07 PM   #59
Crosley68
Member
 
Crosley68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 937
Re: Reds after Cordero

Write the check. This allows you to rid yourself of your worst bullpen arm. Seems like it upgrades every spot in the pen by moving everyone down one spot.
__________________
Let's play two!!!

Last edited by Crosley68; 11-23-2007 at 02:08 PM. Reason: spelling
Crosley68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:07 PM   #60
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,686
Re: Reds after Cordero

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
I'd like it if the Reds signed Cordero.

Sure, all relief pitchers are risky.

10 million/year isn't too much, when put in perspective.. I mean, Stanton and Weathers combine for around 6-7 million next year, and they are a much bigger crapshoot.

My main beef with the Reds' FA signings last year is that they spent all their money on spare parts, as opposed to guys that could actually make a difference. IMO, Cordero is a guy that could actually make a difference.
Yep. If they can dump Stanton somehow, with Saarloos and Cormier already off the books, its not an unreasonable increase in the amount of payroll allocated to the pen. Meanwhile the talent level in the pen goes up significantly IMO.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25