![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
|
CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
I've always thought, while watching NFL games, that some teams seemed to get consistently favorable coverage from commentators and broadcasters. Usually it's just subtle and stuff I (admittedly) only notice about teams I dislike, like New England.
Call me a hater, but I sense that there's something just a little too cozy about this "arrangement" (which was mentioned in tonight's NE/PITT telecast): http://wbztv.com/sports/Patriot.Plac....2.607023.html Quote:
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: C-Bus (Columbus OH for non-Jim Rome fans)
Posts: 1,001
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
I saw this during the broadcast and I too wondered how this might affect CBS coverage of Patriots games or even issues...say Robert Kraft was investigated for tax evasion...hypothetically of course...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Future
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,462
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
Why not try and get something like that for the Banks? That would lighten up the atmosphere, and give us a better option for postgame parties.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
Sports coverage is ENTERTAINMENT. It is NOT a presidential election. It doesn't have to be impartial. It never has been and it never will be. There are conflicts of interest in sports coverage all over the place. There are newspapers that own sports teams, for God's sake.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,223
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
Quote:
I think that's a fair point. If it appears that the CBS announcers are favoring NE, NE sure hasn't given them an excuse not to. If NE starts to suck, I'm sure CBS will move on to the hot hand. About the only problem I could see is when the TV contracts expire. It might be a bit akward when one ownership group is partners with a network that is bidding on the rights to the games but it never seemed to be a problem when Fox owned the Dodgers or when Disney owned the Angels.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 6,967
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
I agree that they are partial to New England as well as Indianapolis and Pittsburgh. It's no different than Fox being partial to Dallas, Green Bay, and New York. Whoever draws the ratings is going to get the bulk of the coverage.
__________________
"My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 4,924
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
Wow, way too much "TV" for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,305
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
Even if they are impartial, it doesn't effect the score.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: C-Bus (Columbus OH for non-Jim Rome fans)
Posts: 1,001
|
Re: CBS & New England - Impartiality Issues?
Ok, how about the FSN Banks Restaurant....vintage clips of FSN personalities....George Grandes best Cardinals praises....Jim Day's Famous Flubs...Chris Welsh's Inane Comment Gallery...just an idea...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |