RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

View Poll Results: Who is the #13 prospect? (runoff)
Carlos Fisher 27 35.06%
Juan Francisco 21 27.27%
Sean Watson 29 37.66%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2007, 01:16 PM   #1
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,677
Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

There is a three way race for the #13 prospect between Carlos Fisher, Juan Francisco and Sean Watson after 85 votes.

Vote for the one you think is the best option. The two that don't win will be put back on the ballot for #14.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-07-2007, 01:31 PM   #2
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,075
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

nice fisher is out to the early lead!
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 01:32 PM   #3
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

I have a feeling #14 & #15 will fall to the guys that don't win this runoff.
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 01:34 PM   #4
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,477
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

I'm a Watson guy here. He should be able to parlay that nasty knuckle-curve into some kind of career at the major league level.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 01:35 PM   #5
TOBTTReds
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,667
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highlifeman21 View Post
I have a feeling #14 & #15 will fall to the guys that don't win this runoff.
Hey alright, 13 votes later, you are starting to realize how this works! Sorry I couldn't resist.
TOBTTReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 01:52 PM   #6
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvesIce51 View Post
Hey alright, 13 votes later, you are starting to realize how this works! Sorry I couldn't resist.
Which means for #14, I will vote for Chris Dickerson yet again. And when he doesn't win as #14, I'll vote for him for #15.
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 02:17 PM   #7
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,913
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

I voted for Fisher. I'm just a tad scared of a guy who gets hit around that hard in the FSL. 8 HR in 54 IP is an accomplishment in Sarasota. I'm pretty much splitting hairs. This should really be a scouting decision, so I'm voting along with some other voters whom I trust.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 02:30 PM   #8
Kc61
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,824
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
I voted for Fisher. I'm just a tad scared of a guy who gets hit around that hard in the FSL. 8 HR in 54 IP is an accomplishment in Sarasota. I'm pretty much splitting hairs. This should really be a scouting decision, so I'm voting along with some other voters whom I trust.

I think Francisco's upside and performance as a 19-20 year old exceeds the prospects of the other two, with the possible exception that I could see Watson emerging as a reliever. So I'm for Francisco, would put Watson second, Fisher third.
Kc61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 02:30 PM   #9
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,989
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Quote:
Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
I'm a Watson guy here. He should be able to parlay that nasty knuckle-curve into some kind of career at the major league level.
Yeah between these 3 I think Watson and Fisher make it to the show and Watson has the bigger upside. I am hoping for Fisher to prove me wrong as he will likely be a starter but I don't see it. I like Francisco but feel he has too many hurdles, the plate discipline the lack of a defensive position (LF or 1B at best). But again I would love to see him prove me wrong.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 02:45 PM   #10
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,677
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

RMR, if its a scouting discussion then its probably Watson/Francisco - gap - Fisher. Their upsides are much better than Fishers. Watson has a mid 90s fastball and a devastating plus curveball to go along with two other pitches that he throws. Francisco has good bat speed, a rocket for an arm, tons of current power with even more projection and real bad plate discipline, but thats the only thing going against him. Fisher has a big body and a good fastball and sinker, but stuff wise he is not in the same class as Watson and his size isn't an advantage of him either.

That said, I voted Francisco based on his tools.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 03:13 PM   #11
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

I'll keep voting for Fisher until he finally wins one.

Francisco doesn't know what the strike zone is. He'll never get on base at any type of remotely decent clip until he figures out that a strike zone actually exists in baseball.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 03:23 PM   #12
REDblooded
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,119
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Yep.....Francisco for me. Upside galore, and massive power potential.
REDblooded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 03:44 PM   #13
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,913
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
I think Francisco's upside and performance as a 19-20 year old exceeds the prospects of the other two, with the possible exception that I could see Watson emerging as a reliever. So I'm for Francisco, would put Watson second, Fisher third.
I love his power potential but I don't trust minor league power that is paired with horrific discipline. I'm sure he's getting 2 or 3 hittable pitches per at bat and doing a lot of damage to them when he makes contact. But he's only going to see fewer and I have more faith in a guy developing power as he matures than I do a historic free swinger learning to reign things in. Put in him the FSL and I think you see a .220/.260/.375 kind of ugly, ugly line.

I know he's got tools but tools without skills makes for a really good A ball player. He's young and has a long time to mature. But prospect rating wise, I need to see another tool translated in to a skill before I invest. The power can come through maturation. The plate discipline and contact are harder to develop.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

Last edited by RedsManRick; 12-07-2007 at 03:46 PM.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 03:45 PM   #14
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Sean Watson for #13 '08
Carlos Fisher will be two years older than Sean Watson and will have played only one level higher. Sean Watson has been more highly regarded by scouts than Carlos Fisher.

Code:
Name		 H/9	BB/9	 K/9	WHIP
Sean Watson	8.17	2.40	9.25	1.17
Carlos Fisher	8.80	2.66	7.59	1.27

Name		 AB	BB	  K	 OBP
Juan Francisco	752	29	204	.303
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587
http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg
camisadelgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2007, 03:59 PM   #15
Kc61
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,824
Re: Redszone Community Prospect Vote RUNOFF: #13

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
I love his power potential but I don't trust minor league power that is paired with horrific discipline. I'm sure he's getting 2 or 3 hittable pitches per at bat and doing a lot of damage to them when he makes contact. But he's only going to see fewer and I have more faith in a guy developing power as he matures than I do a historic free swinger learning to reign things in. Put in him the FSL and I think you see a .220/.260/.375 kind of ugly, ugly line.

I know he's got tools but tools without skills makes for a really good A ball player. He's young and has a long time to mature. But prospect rating wise, I need to see another tool translated in to a skill before I invest. The power can come through maturation. The plate discipline and contact are harder to develop.
Well, Fisher will be 25 before next season. He hasn't yet mastered AA. He's never been touted as a high prospect. His main attribute seems to be his abilty to keep the ball down, important at GABP for sure.

Watson is a polished college pitcher who blew away low A ball, as did a number of others (Thompson, Gonzalez) but then had a tougher time at High-A.

Francisco is now 20 and had .268, 25, 90 at low-A. I've been told repeatedly on this site to ignore strikeouts and focus on production. Here's a guy with huge production. With even slight improvement in plate discipline, his numbers would be off the chart. At the number 13 pick, considering that he is a young prospect, I'm taking that chance.

This is not a doubles hitter, say a Chris Valaika, who needs to develop superior plate discipline to be effective. Francisco has huge power production, so even if he is never a high OBP guy he can produce.

While I'm hopeful all three will pan out, and I consider them all good prospects, the choice here seems apparent to me.

Last edited by Kc61; 12-07-2007 at 04:05 PM.
Kc61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25