![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 92
|
Projected Lineups as of today
Against Righties:
Hamilton Phillips Dunn Griffey Encarnacion Votto Valentin Gonzalez Against Lefties: Hopper Keppinger Griffey/Hamilton/Dunn Phillips Dunn/Hamiton/Griffey Encarancion Ross Gonzalez Not too shabby! A bunch of hitters at every point!
__________________
"Just shut up and play baseball"...Mike Piazza |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 544
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
I like Votto #2. He's a good OBP guy with decent speed. He also would (maybe) see more fastballs since he's in front of Dunn
The problem is 4 lefties in a row. So then I would move EE 4th instead of BP since his OBP is better. Griffey is 5th, which is still a good spot for him. (From memory) he hit very well couple years ago (2005?) batting 5th. BP goes 6th and his all or nothing approach would be acceptable there. Against Righties: Hamilton Votto Dunn Encarnacion Griffey Phillips Ross/Valentin Gonzalez Last edited by mlbfan30; 12-12-2007 at 12:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,077
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
can't put Phillips #2... no OBP
I also believe that Ross will see more starts against RHP than Valentin... RH: Hamilton EE Dunn Griffey Phillips Votto Gonzalez Ross LH: Hopper Keppinger Dunn Griffey Phillips EE Gonzalez Ross
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 544
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
Do you really want Hopper and his BA alone determining how often he reaches base. I would like to see both Hamilton and Votto seeing more time against lefties than they probably will have. You can't force them to be career platoon guys. I'd argue that the more you replace them for lefties, the worse they become at hitting lefties since they don't get enough PA. I'd only use Hopper/Kepp to give rest when needed, but not have both in the lineup in the same day.
The reason BP and EE flip is basically because BP is a better hitter against LHP, while EE stays close to the same. If I had to put Hopper here, I would just bat him 7th or 8th Against Lefties: (1 possibility) Hamilton Keppinger/Votto Dunn Phillips Griffey Encarnacion Ross Gonzalez |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 709
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
I just hate seeing Hamilton in the lead off spot. He just seems to be more valuable in RBI opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,344
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
I agree. I'd have Keppinger play SS and lead off. After that, everyone can pretty much hit until the 8 and 9 spots. Really wish we had a catcher who could hit.
__________________
FIRE DUSTY BAKER ADOPT THIS SIGNATURE IN SOLIDARITY!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
Here's my lineup against Righties and Lefties
1. CF- Hamilton 2. 3rd- Encarnacion 3. LF- Dunn 4. 2nd- Phillips 5. RF- Griffey 6. 1st- Votto 7. SS- Gonzo 8. C- Ross/Javy 9. Pitcher
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 272
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
I really don't think these lineups are bad at all, there are a lot of options and hopefully the defense will stay somewhat consistent. It's the pitching that has me worried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,049
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
#2 is tough to hit; I wouldn't put Votto there to start, maybe later in season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
fan
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Buchanan, MI
Posts: 391
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 544
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
No teams needs a "true" leadoff hitter. Juan Pierre is a "true" leadoff hitter and he sucks. All the Reds need is a good OBP guy with some speed and some power. Hamilton showed he can handle it last year and can again this year. So what if he doesn't get as many RBIs opps. This is his stat line from the leadoff spot
.336 .405 .617 -0.341 BABIP- This is Keppinger, but he has good numbers from the 2nd spot. .143 .217 .286 -.105 BABIP-[23PA] ----------- .323 .378 .444 -0.325 BABIP- This is Hopper .343 .395 .404 -0.380 BABIP-(not as bad as i thought it would be, but do you really think he's a .340 hitter. Put him down to a .300 hitter and his line looks more like .300/.350/.350) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
I agree with you milner, it's just tough to find a way for that to work. playing hopper is the solution in my opinion, but who do you bench to play him? you really can't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Latin Heartthrob
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 625
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,077
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
We pretty much agree. You should consider moving Griffey ahead of Phillips because of the better Onbase PCT...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,077
|
Re: Projected Lineups as of today
why is #2 tough to hit? What makes it different?
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |