RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2008, 07:59 PM   #1
scuba17
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 85
Ranking the NL Central

Just have to make this comment since I can't on the other forum.

In that thread a poster claims that Johnny Estrada would be the best catcher in the NL Central had he stayed with Milwaukee. The same Johnny Estrada with a sub .700 OPS in 2 of the last 3 years. He also threw out a whopping number of 13% of runners attemptng to steal last year.

How did nobody point that out?
scuba17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 02-04-2008, 08:16 PM   #2
gedred69
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: way-east of cincinnati
Posts: 1,158
Re: Ranking the NL Central

I would rather have a good defensive catcher like ugh-choke, Ross.
gedred69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 08:21 PM   #3
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,078
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Quote:
Originally Posted by scuba17 View Post
Just have to make this comment since I can't on the other forum.

In that thread a poster claims that Johnny Estrada would be the best catcher in the NL Central had he stayed with Milwaukee. The same Johnny Estrada with a sub .700 OPS in 2 of the last 3 years. He also threw out a whopping number of 13% of runners attemptng to steal last year.

How did nobody point that out?
I too was screaming in my head
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:35 PM   #4
Jefferson24
Plan to be spontaneous
 
Jefferson24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,178
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Ross had a bad year. This year will tell us if 06 was the norn of if 07 was what we should expect. I think he will pick it up, I expect improvement and will be surprised if he doesn't put up close to 06 numbers. Ross is much better than Estrada, any day.
__________________
We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells
Jefferson24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:38 PM   #5
Bip Roberts
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,189
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Its because a lot of people in the other forum aren't all that smart.
Bip Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:42 PM   #6
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,078
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson24 View Post
Ross had a bad year. This year will tell us if 06 was the norn of if 07 was what we should expect. I think he will pick it up, I expect improvement and will be surprised if he doesn't put up close to 06 numbers. Ross is much better than Estrada, any day.
I don't expect Ross to put up '06 numbers or '07 numbers. I'm thinking more of something right in the middle, say .230/.310/.440, which is adequate with the great defense he plays and the favorable contract he is signed to...
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:46 PM   #7
Jefferson24
Plan to be spontaneous
 
Jefferson24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,178
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bip Roberts View Post
Its because a lot of people in the other forum aren't all that smart.
I don't want to start anythting but is it too much to ask that we use this board to have constructive discussions. I don't see what good comes from comments like Bip's.

I have seen a number of post in the last few days that seem over the top and I think it would be better for everyone if folks just tried to stay positive.

My 2 cents.
__________________
We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells
Jefferson24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:51 PM   #8
Jefferson24
Plan to be spontaneous
 
Jefferson24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,178
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Quote:
Originally Posted by *BaseClogger* View Post
I don't expect Ross to put up '06 numbers or '07 numbers. I'm thinking more of something right in the middle, say .230/.310/.440, which is adequate with the great defense he plays and the favorable contract he is signed to...
You're right. As good as his defense is he doesn't have to put up big numbers. But there is nothing wrong with wishing for both. I tend to agree with your prediction about his numbers being in between 06 and 07. I think he lands closer to 06 though and that's a good thing for the Reds.
__________________
We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells
Jefferson24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:53 PM   #9
Bip Roberts
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,189
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson24 View Post
I don't want to start anythting but is it too much to ask that we use this board to have constructive discussions. I don't see what good comes from comments like Bip's.

I have seen a number of post in the last few days that seem over the top and I think it would be better for everyone if folks just tried to stay positive.

My 2 cents.
He asked why so I told him
Bip Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:59 PM   #10
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,078
Re: Ranking the NL Central

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson24 View Post
You're right. As good as his defense is he doesn't have to put up big numbers. But there is nothing wrong with wishing for both. I tend to agree with your prediction about his numbers being in between 06 and 07. I think he lands closer to 06 though and that's a good thing for the Reds.
as the kids say- the numbers from '06 were "sick": .255/.353/.579

I don't think Ross will come close to that slugging with such little contact. The man just hit everything over the fence in '06....
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25