RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2008, 09:05 PM   #1
reds44
Member
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Here is the Reds lineup tonight, with BA and OPS included.

1. Ryan Freel (.273/.589)
2. Brandon Phillips (.253/.682)
3. Ken Griffey Jr. (.268/.762)
4. Adam Dunn (.182/.730)
5. Jeff Keppinger (.321/.852)
6. Joey Votto (.292/.848)
7. Edwin Encarnacion (.266/.882)
8. Paul Bako (.327/.921)


Am I the only one that sees a problem with this?

First of all, somebody needs to tell Dusty CF right now is the Reds worst offensive position on the diamond. If it's Patterson, Freel, or Hopper, none of them belong anywhere near leadoff. Somebody really needs to tell Brandon Phillips to stop swinging for the downs. He is looking like he did back in his old day with the Indians.

The Reds 4 best hitters right now (3 of which whom I don't see why you would expect to stop hitting) are batting in the bottom 4 spots of the batting order (excluding the pitcher).

Something isn't right about that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
Uncle does it again

Last edited by reds44; 04-21-2008 at 09:07 PM.
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 04-21-2008, 09:07 PM   #2
Matt700wlw
Making sense of it all
 
Matt700wlw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Bako should be batting higher

That is damn funny, even though we KNOW it won't last.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
Matt700wlw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:08 PM   #3
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,487
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

I agree with you on Freel, but your reading far too much into the sample size. I mean Paul Bako has the highest OPS so far... you can't base these types of decisions on such small samples.
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:08 PM   #4
reds44
Member
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Kearns View Post
I agree with you on Freel, but your reading far too much into the sample size. I mean Paul Bako has the highest OPS so far... you can't base these types of decisions on such small samples.
Freel and Phillips belong nowhere near 1-2.

Freel should be batting 8th, and Phillips 6th.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
Uncle does it again
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:09 PM   #5
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Seeing Griffey and Dunn 3/4 is a welcomed change.

Unfortunately, that welcomed change came at the expense of having Freel and Phillips 1/2, when Keppinger's shown good production out of the 2 spot, and Phillips continues to be an out-making machine.

Sadly, the Reds continue to lack a true leadoff hitter, and I fear that not having a reliable table-setter at the top of the lineup will only lead to less runs scored, and an anemic offense not putting up enough runs for a fledgling pitching staff.
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:11 PM   #6
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

I don't agree with you on Bako.

Everything else you mention, I'm cool wit it.

CF at lead-off written in stone is just plain dumb considering our personnel.

Oh well, c'est la vie.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:13 PM   #7
reds44
Member
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

1. Keppinger
2. Votto
3. Dunn
4. Encarnacion
5. Griffey
6. Phillips
7. Bako
8. Whoever is playing CF unless his name is Jay Bruce
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
Uncle does it again
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:14 PM   #8
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,487
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
Freel and Phillips belong nowhere near 1-2.

Freel should be batting 8th, and Phillips 6th.
I agreed with you on Freel... and Phillips isn't going to be moved. This discussion has taken place literally every day for the past 3 years on this board. Yes, Phillips should not be #2, but really have you just discovered this now?
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:20 PM   #9
Spring~Fields
Member
 
Spring~Fields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,630
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
First of all, somebody needs to tell Dusty CF right now is the Reds worst offensive position on the diamond.
I didn't know how right you are until I just read the following.

Quote:
MORE COREY: Baker didn’t realize until Sunday that Patterson had been struggling so mightily on offense. He’s hitless in his last 21 at-bats, tying a career high. In his last 10 games, he’s 1-for-28.

“It didn’t seem like that because he’s not striking out. Most of the time when a guy is 0-for-something, he’s got a bunch of punch-outs in there,” Baker said.

Patterson has only struck out four times in 59 at-bats.

He’s one of the toughest players to fan in the league, with one strikeout in every 20 at-bats, Baker said.

“He’ll be all right,” Baker said. “He’ll be fine.”
And Baker can't be handed some of the blame ? I think so.
Spring~Fields is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:22 PM   #10
Matt700wlw
Making sense of it all
 
Matt700wlw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

That's nice. Dusty didn't even know.


WE KNEW!!!! We're just stupid fans.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
Matt700wlw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:23 PM   #11
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,948
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

We can harp on the lineup construction all day but bottom line is that these guys need to start hitting...period. If they were performing and lineup construction was holding them back then I think we'd have a legit beef. But you can order these guys anyway you'd like right now. The only difference would be that we wouldn't have Dusty to blame.
edabbs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:24 PM   #12
CrackerJack
Member
 
CrackerJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 4,932
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
MORE COREY: Baker didn’t realize until Sunday that Patterson had been struggling so mightily on offense. He’s hitless in his last 21 at-bats, tying a career high. In his last 10 games, he’s 1-for-28.

“It didn’t seem like that because he’s not striking out. Most of the time when a guy is 0-for-something, he’s got a bunch of punch-outs in there,” Baker said.

Patterson has only struck out four times in 59 at-bats.

He’s one of the toughest players to fan in the league, with one strikeout in every 20 at-bats, Baker said.

“He’ll be all right,” Baker said. “He’ll be fine.”

God help us all.
CrackerJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:24 PM   #13
Spring~Fields
Member
 
Spring~Fields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,630
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt700wlw View Post
That's nice. Dusty didn't even know.


WE KNEW!!!! We're just stupid fans.
What else doesn't he realize?
Spring~Fields is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:26 PM   #14
reds44
Member
 
reds44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackerJack View Post
God help us all.
Good Lord.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
Uncle does it again
reds44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 09:28 PM   #15
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt700wlw View Post
That's nice. Dusty didn't even know.


WE KNEW!!!! We're just stupid fans.
Things aren't as bad as we thought.... they're worse!

Can someone get Dusty a stat sheet?!?!?!?! LMAO, just utterly ridiculous. :thumbdown Wake up Dusty.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25