![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Here is the Reds lineup tonight, with BA and OPS included.
1. Ryan Freel (.273/.589) 2. Brandon Phillips (.253/.682) 3. Ken Griffey Jr. (.268/.762) 4. Adam Dunn (.182/.730) 5. Jeff Keppinger (.321/.852) 6. Joey Votto (.292/.848) 7. Edwin Encarnacion (.266/.882) 8. Paul Bako (.327/.921) Am I the only one that sees a problem with this? First of all, somebody needs to tell Dusty CF right now is the Reds worst offensive position on the diamond. If it's Patterson, Freel, or Hopper, none of them belong anywhere near leadoff. Somebody really needs to tell Brandon Phillips to stop swinging for the downs. He is looking like he did back in his old day with the Indians. The Reds 4 best hitters right now (3 of which whom I don't see why you would expect to stop hitting) are batting in the bottom 4 spots of the batting order (excluding the pitcher). Something isn't right about that. Last edited by reds44; 04-21-2008 at 09:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Bako should be batting higher
![]() That is damn funny, even though we KNOW it won't last.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,487
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
I agree with you on Freel, but your reading far too much into the sample size. I mean Paul Bako has the highest OPS so far... you can't base these types of decisions on such small samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Quote:
Freel should be batting 8th, and Phillips 6th. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Seeing Griffey and Dunn 3/4 is a welcomed change.
Unfortunately, that welcomed change came at the expense of having Freel and Phillips 1/2, when Keppinger's shown good production out of the 2 spot, and Phillips continues to be an out-making machine. Sadly, the Reds continue to lack a true leadoff hitter, and I fear that not having a reliable table-setter at the top of the lineup will only lead to less runs scored, and an anemic offense not putting up enough runs for a fledgling pitching staff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
I don't agree with you on Bako.
Everything else you mention, I'm cool wit it. CF at lead-off written in stone is just plain dumb considering our personnel. Oh well, c'est la vie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
1. Keppinger
2. Votto 3. Dunn 4. Encarnacion 5. Griffey 6. Phillips 7. Bako 8. Whoever is playing CF unless his name is Jay Bruce |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,487
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
I agreed with you on Freel... and Phillips isn't going to be moved. This discussion has taken place literally every day for the past 3 years on this board. Yes, Phillips should not be #2, but really have you just discovered this now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,630
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,149
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
That's nice. Dusty didn't even know.
WE KNEW!!!! We're just stupid fans.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,948
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
We can harp on the lineup construction all day but bottom line is that these guys need to start hitting...period. If they were performing and lineup construction was holding them back then I think we'd have a legit beef. But you can order these guys anyway you'd like right now. The only difference would be that we wouldn't have Dusty to blame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 4,932
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Quote:
God help us all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,630
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: Amazingly Bad Lineup Construction
Quote:
Can someone get Dusty a stat sheet?!?!?!?! LMAO, just utterly ridiculous. :thumbdown Wake up Dusty. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |