![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of Mr. Sickel's Crystal Ball? | |||
| Too Optimistic - peak won't be that good |
|
4 | 7.69% |
| Too Optimistic - he won't last that long |
|
9 | 17.31% |
| Just Right |
|
12 | 23.08% |
| Too Pessimistic - he will last longer |
|
1 | 1.92% |
| Too Pessimistic - peak will be better |
|
26 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
John Sickels posted his personal "crystal ball" for Jay Bruce over on his site (www.minorleagueball.com/). Here's what he predicts:
I'd like to see what RedsZone thinks about John's prognosis. Too optimistic, Just Right, or Too Pessimistic? Last edited by Screwball; 05-01-2008 at 02:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
I think he'll be a perennial .300-.320 hitter with 35-40 homeruns maybe more in some seasons. John does a solid job with the crystal balls - those projections are always fun to read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
I don't like him listing him as playing with the Astros. Numbers though, how could any of us be upset if Jay Bruce puts up HoF type numbers.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,630
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
I think that he is shorting Bruce in the early years. I expect him to do Votto numbers if not better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
Quote:
However, it's tough to complain about the predicted peak numbers. 80-95 XBH a year, with almost half of 'em being home runs? 504 career homers? I'll take it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,420
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
2014 -2016 look like MVP years if I'm not mistaken
I'll take a three-time MVP in a Reds uni
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,071
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
That's pretty much what I envision for his future (assuming he stays physically & mentally healthy).
The only nit I would pick is that his walk rate looks too low, especially later in his career after he has established himself as a superduperstar. Pitchers will start nibbling and intentionally walking him if he establishes himself as a 300 hitting 40 HR guy. Plus, even before he establishes himself, I highly doubt he will be a hacking away to the tune of a paltry 30+ walks per year. Sickels has him flirting with a sub-300 OBP right up until he becomes an MVP candidate in 2013. That's is not realistic IMO. I expect him to start out as a 50 walks per year kind of hitter and eventually build towards 80 walks per year as he hits his peak. Last edited by Steve4192; 05-01-2008 at 10:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,036
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
While those numbers look very nice, apparently Sickels doesn't know that Bruce is the Boss; I think his peak will be better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Playoffs
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
Quote:
People may get giddy with those counting stats listed, but the approx. OBP with those stats is .340 with the approx. SLG being around .520, good for an .860 OPS. What's suspect to me is Sickels has Bruce with 1,112 extra base hits and only 798 walks (as an aside, Griffey has exactly 1,112 extra base hits right now to go with 1,175 walks). To me, if Bruce is going to put up that high of an extra base hit total, then his walk total will be higher. If he's only walking once every 13 PAs then I highly doubt he'll stroke 1,100 extra base hits. I'm not sure if that player has ever existed, and if he does exist then there isn't many of them around.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012 Put an end to the Lost Decade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
Quote:
2014: .362*/.621/.983 2015: .368*/.573/.941 2016: .382*/.568/.950 *: I figured up his OBP by adding hits and walks and then dividing by PA. I didn't have information concerning sac flies and reached on errors, etc., so I just ignored it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
A few guys I think of when I look at this thread are Joe Carter, Andres Galarraga, and Jim Rice. I don't think any of them struck out as much as Bruce is projected to, but they're a few players I recall not walking very much and still managing to put up some good power numbers year in and year out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
Blasphemey! He'll be a career Red and hit 50 homers every year.
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Monfort Heights
Posts: 524
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
I had to go with too optimistic. The number I really didn't like was the 504 HR. Projecting a player who has not played in the majors to hit 500+ HR is a huge reach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 384
|
Re: Jay Bruce Crystal Ball
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |