![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,403
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Well, Jake, speaking for myself, I tossed out my list as a starting point. Sure KC wouldn't take that. But the list you have put together? Bailey, Thompson, Frazier and Cumberland? I would do that too. It's negotiable. Getting someone like Grienke is worth putting the depth of the Reds system to the test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
I thought you'd be bigger
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Green Country
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Quote:
As for Grienke, I'd think KC's simply trying to sell high. The guy's been known as a bit of head case in these parts. Royals are a long way away from contending - convert his current 2.88 ERA into something bigger, more long term and move on.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 9,003
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,837
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Quote:
That wouls be a package that could get you a Haren type pitcher i.e. proven ace. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,837
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Quote:
The trade was for one year of an often injured Edmonds, who then signed a long term deal with the Cards. As I said, Walt's specialty is signing FA's to be, and then signing them long term. Shining up minor leaguers to trade is something I don't think he's ever done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 9,003
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Cruisin' for trouble
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 3,287
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Haren and Bedard commanded top notch packages to acquire. Greinke is not in the same class with Haren and Bedard. While the package has to be attractive, what I've heard is that KC wants to restock the minors. That makes a package including Stubbs, Bailey and a couple of others appear to meet that goal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,987
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Greinke's lack of sustained success is precisely why he's a perfect target. Sure, if the Royals want a Haren/Bedard package, you move on. But if you can come in under that, you can get through his prime under market who has made it through the injury nexus unharmed (physically) and has enough innings to prove he's at least a league average pitcher. He's at the cusp of getting too expensive, but not there yet.
I think a Bailey, Stubbs, Fransisco offer would at least get you a real spot at the table. The question comes down to how Bailey is valued. I don't think any of us has a real good sense of the perception out there -- my sense is that his valuation is all over the map. It depends on how the Royals view him.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,837
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Quote:
It would be if I thought he was actually good ( I don't), and he was in his walk year (he's not). These type of deals only mak sense if you have the money to throw around and sign these guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Cruisin' for trouble
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 3,287
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
Thompson is pitching well for the Bats since his promotion to AAA. Would you consider a package including Thompson to the Royals for Greinke?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 3,944
|
Re: Zack Grienke?
First off lets deal with Greinke's "head case". He suffered a form of depression that is treatable both clinically and medically. He's not a head case in a baseball sense at all. Very amenable to coaching, very intelligent, and he IS a pitcher, not a thrower. The guy is for real. He, Gordon and David De Jesus are my favorite Royals. Living here I watch several Royals games every year and follow the team with some interest, though not on the same emotional level as the Reds. I would give up the package I named for Greinke. I think he is as good as Haren and will prove out long term but yes, the stigma associated with clinical depression will haunt Zack, probably for the rest of his career. The chance to acquire a young pitcher of his quality is just too good not to go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,084
|
Zack Greinke?
I don't typically like to fixate much on the pie-in-the-sky possibilities, as the landscape in Major League Baseball manages to keep Reds' fans grounded -- or at least does its best to try.
However, today on the CBS Facts & Rumors blog, David Andriesen is citing a New York Post report by George King that the Royals will listen on anyone, including Greinke. That blog is found here. It seems to me that Greinke is the kind of guy the Reds should pay dearly for and not regret it. On the down side, he's due for a significant raise next year (up to $13.5 mil from his current $7.25 mil salary). But on the plus side, he's signed for two seasons, could be fit into this year's budget a bit easier and with Arroyo and Harang likely coming off the books, could be fit into the next few years' payroll much easier. Combine that with the fact he's still young, has a relatively clean bill of health and is a true ace, to me... a package of Travis Wood, Yonder Alonso, et all makes a ton of sense. Perhaps Kansas City is only listening in theory, and would still ask for half of any team's 40-man roster to make the deal work. But I do think the Reds have what it would take, if they're willing.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,486
|
Re: Zack Greinke?
I'm hesitant about trading Wood, but if Greinke was on the table, I'd lose a lot of sleep considering it.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,085
|
Re: Zack Greinke?
If Greinke was on the table and Wood was the best player we were giving them in exchange, I would bite the Royals' hand so hard that they'd have to praw my jaws open with a crowbar long after I died.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,084
|
Re: Zack Greinke?
Quote:
I would imagine it would cost the Reds, at very minimum, Wood and Alonso both, and I fret to imagine what else. But if the package started with those two, it's probably a no-brainer.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |