RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2008, 06:37 AM   #16
icehole3
Member
 
icehole3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,027
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

since the crown jewels
icehole3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 08-31-2008, 08:44 PM   #17
fearofpopvol1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,633
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Anyone think with Votto's recent surge he has a shot against the medie darling Cubs' Soto?

Soto's overall numbers do look better as of now (especially when you consider he's a catcher), but with a really great September, I wonder if Votto might be able to make a run.
fearofpopvol1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 08:50 PM   #18
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Soto is a lock to win it. Votto could hit 30 homeruns and OPS .900 and Soto would win it because he plays for the first place Cubs.
OnBaseMachine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 08:59 PM   #19
flyer85
He has the Evil Eye!
 
flyer85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Soto has to be a lock
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
flyer85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 09:04 PM   #20
jojo
Five Tool Fool
 
jojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,570
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
Soto is a lock to win it. Votto could hit 30 homeruns and OPS .900 and Soto would win it because he plays for the first place Cubs.
Soto would win it because he's a catcher hitting .287/.368/.507 while playing in nearly all of his team's games.

The real injustice would be if Votto won it because his team was higher in the standings....
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
jojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 09:07 PM   #21
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

FWIW, I think Soto deserves the award. I'm just saying if Votto had the same numbers as a rookie from a first place team, regardless of position, the award would probably go to the guy on the better team.
OnBaseMachine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 11:06 PM   #22
cincinnati chili
post hype sleeper
 
cincinnati chili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 10,350
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Unanimous for Soto. This was discussable in June. Not now.
__________________
On Dasher On Dancer On Prancer Ondrusek
cincinnati chili is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 03:05 AM   #23
Matt700wlw
Making sense of it all
 
Matt700wlw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Votto's made a nice case, but Soto...the Cub...sadly, has the numbers, and should get it.
__________________
An excited shade of Red
Matt700wlw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 09:33 AM   #24
Hap
Plays The Right Way
 
Hap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 796.357
Posts: 1,676
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

I think Hal Morris should win it instead of David Justice.
__________________
.
Hap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 09:48 AM   #25
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

I think the AL race has gotten a little more interesting, with Longoria out of action and the Rays just rolling along without him like he was never there.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 12:38 PM   #26
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by blumj View Post
I think the AL race has gotten a little more interesting, with Longoria out of action and the Rays just rolling along without him like he was never there.
The AL award is going to be very interesting if for no other reason that there are about 10 guys putting up solid rookie years. I think Longoria is the clear winner and should also win the gold glove. At first blush, I'd rank them like this:

1. Longoria, TAM
2. Galarraga, DET
3. Chamerlain, NYY
4. Aviles, KC
5. Ziegler, OAK

I'm imagine Ellsbury and Alexi Ramirez will finish in the top 5 along side the first 3 I've listed and Galarraga will probably be 4th or 5th.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 12:39 PM   #27
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Longoria should have the AL Rookie of the Year award locked up IMO.
OnBaseMachine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 01:13 PM   #28
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
Re: NL Rookie of the Year 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
Longoria should have the AL Rookie of the Year award locked up IMO.
I still think he has to come back and play more, and he is expected to. But, if something changes and he only winds up playing a few more games, then I think the door's still open for someone else who finishes strongly, like Aviles or Galarraga.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25