![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
I'm back... and forth
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,612
|
Brandon Phillips against RHP
Going into Thursday:
.236/.285/.388 for an OPS of .637. In the cleanup spot. Every night against Righties. 39:12 K:BB rate. I'll admit he rakes against Lefties, but his approach against RHP has been comical this year. I don't recall his hacking being this bad in years past, but there is no way this man belongs in the cleanup spot vs. RHP. No way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
He has struggled this season, but to be honest, I think he's hitting below what he's capable of. I agree he's not a cleanup hitter, but he is a good hitter. This team honestly doesn't have a true cleanup hitter imo, griffey also isn't a true 3 hitter anymore, so it kind of stinks for your 3-4 hitters to not be legit. I think bruce is the 3 of the future, and votto possibly 5 if they can get a good right handed 4 hitter to put between them, but we'll see what happens. just supposing they could get someone like kempe or holliday, and you lose dunn, you could go something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 45
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
It seems the pressure of being clean up has changed his plate approach. It looks like he's trying to muscle the ball all the time. I think if he could move to another slot we would see the Brandon of old - a very good hitter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
Quote:
Agreed. He needs to get out of this 40+ HR mentality as he likely will never hit that many. He needs to shoot the gaps much like he did last year, As many of those turn into dingers anyway in our park. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Old Red Guard Reject
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,419
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
Swings wildly at breaking balls and gets behind in the count.....translates to that .637 OPS you speak of.
__________________
If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,013
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
I would honestly like Bruce or Votto at 2, then Phillips at 3, with a combo of Griffey and Dunn at 4 and 5. It is clear pitchers are afraid of Griffey and Dunn, so stack them back to back pleeeeease. You can have to other of Votto and Bruce at 6, because both of them don't struggle much against lefties, especially Votto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Springfield
Posts: 641
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
I may be wrong but isn't that a OPS of .673 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 65
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
.285 + .388 = .673
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Springfield
Posts: 641
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
LOL thats what I thought
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,064
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
He needs Barry Larkin, his idol growing up, as the hitting coach to teach him the ways of the opposite field line drive again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Monfort Heights
Posts: 525
|
Re: Brandon Phillips against RHP
This team desperately needs a right handed middle of the order hitter. Phillips clearly isn't it and Edwin hasn't shown any signs that it's going to be him either. At this point though I'd flip EE and Phillips against RHPs.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |