RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-27-2008, 08:50 PM   #31
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Salty's defense is about on caliber with Javy's, teams run on him any chance they get. I would look at the free agent pool to see if there is a catcher coming on the market next year that can handle this young staff. I definitely don't want someone back there that will set their growth back.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 07-27-2008, 08:51 PM   #32
nate
High five!
 
nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,775
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by HokieRed View Post
I'd send them Volquez back for a certain outfielder they have.
I think Milton Bradley's a FA after this season.
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!"
nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 08:54 PM   #33
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate View Post
I think Milton Bradley's a FA after this season.
What's funny is Josh Hamilton gets all the press but he hasn't even been the best outfielder on that team - that honor belongs to Milton Bradley and it's not even close. Bradley has an OPS over .100 points higher than Josh Hamilton and may be the front runner for MVP right now IMO.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 08:58 PM   #34
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,460
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
No thanks. I'll take Volquez over an outfielder who is an average player at best away from home.
Hamilton is a considerably better player than that. Is he as gooas as the home version? No, but the road stats are just as misleading. His OPS+ is right around Adam Dunn, and I think that's a pretty good ballpark for where he is right now. That's pretty good production out of CF.

That said, I feel more comfortable with Volquez for a few reasons. Firstly, Hamilton's history makes it difficult to predict how long his shelf life will be. He could crash and burn a lot earlier than his age suggests. And secondly, I think he's a long term right fielder, not centre fielder. If we plan on keeping Dunn, and I hope that we do, Hamilton is not a fabulous fit for the Reds with Bruce entrenched in right for the next decade +. I know for sure that a pitcher of Volquez' magnitude will always be a great fit.

At face value, we're still talking about two very good players, and I don't see any evidence suggesting one player has been anything but marginally more valuable than the other. It's a pretty close race in total value IMO.
Patrick Bateman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 08:58 PM   #35
Raisor
Member
 
Raisor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,683
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
What's funny is Josh Hamilton gets all the press but he hasn't even been the best outfielder on that team - that honor belongs to Milton Bradley and it's not even close. Bradley has an OPS over .100 points higher than Josh Hamilton and may be the front runner for MVP right now IMO.
Bradley's only played 18 games in the OF this year, which means he won't win the MVP (fair or unfairly)
__________________
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures."
Raisor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 09:04 PM   #36
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,822
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

I can't fathom Cincy "buying" anyone right now. Buy one of the younger catchers, if anyone.
edabbs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 09:11 PM   #37
corkedbat
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,951
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

I'd do Bailey for Ramierez
corkedbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:12 AM   #38
mbgrayson
Red's fan
 
mbgrayson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,933
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

From the Rangers MLB.COM site:

Quote:
The Reds also covet Laird, but aren't willing to give up their top young Minor League pitchers. At least 20 teams have asked about at least one of the four Rangers catchers.
__________________
__________________
"I genuinely like this team. I like the vibe and spirit of this team. This is just the beginning." Dusty on 2/19/12.
mbgrayson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:15 AM   #39
Jpup
Member
 
Jpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 6,967
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Teagarden is the prize, but Laird is a good 2nd choice.
__________________
"My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton
Jpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:19 AM   #40
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

I found this on a Rangers blog:

Quote:
Today's proposal: Would you offer Gerald Laird or Jarrod Saltalamacchia (their choice) and Omar Poveda to Cincinnati for Homer Bailey?

Does this make any sense? Read on to find out ...

• Why it might make some sense: Think of this as a duplication of the Josh Hamilton-Edinson Volquez deal, but with the teams having different needs. The Reds believe they can contend in 2009 and their farm system entered the year one of the few ranked higher than the Rangers, but catching is a weakness. Though Cincinnati spent is No. 1 on C Devin Mesoraco in 2007, he's at low Class A and high school-drafted catchers usually take a significant amount of time to develop. The Reds are using a journeyman duo of Paul Bako and David Ross there right now and they have checked in on Laird. Bailey was recently called back to the majors, but, after three years atop the Reds' organization ranking, he hasn't lived up to expectations. Laird would be under control for two more years; Salty for even longer than that. The Rangers have depth at catcher and could afford to trade either one. The Rangers absolutely must have pitching if they hope to contend next year. Bailey spent three years atop the Reds' prospect rankings, but he hasn't lived up to expectations. He's pitched better in two starts since being recalled from the minors, but is still 0-3 with a 6.29 ERA and he's fallen behind Edinson Volquez and Johnny Cueto in the Reds' pecking order.

• Why it might not: Bailey is 22 and has been projected as a potential No. 1 starter for the last three seasons. Though he's 4-5 with a 5.94 ERA in 14 major league starts (including last year), he is merely a pup. If he develops next year and Cincinnati has a young starting trio of Volquez, Cueto and Bailey to anchor their rotation, along with the veteran Aaron Harang, they might just have the best rotation in the NL. They could afford to put Johnny Bench back there (and he'll be 61 next season) and still contend.

A win-win trade? Something that needs a bit of tweaking? Am I abso-flippin'-lutely nuts? You are on the clock.
Reading some of the Rangers' fans comments, they would trade Salty and a decent pitching prospect in Poveda for Homer in a heartbeat. I would too. I still like Homer but I'd deal him for Salty and Poveda and not look back. This deal would give us a good young catcher and a raw 20-year old power arm.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:22 AM   #41
Jpup
Member
 
Jpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern KY
Posts: 6,967
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
I found this on a Rangers blog:



Reading some of the Rangers' fans comments, they would trade Salty and a decent pitching prospect in Poveda for Homer in a heartbeat. I would too. I still like Homer but I'd deal him for Salty and Poveda and not look back. This deal would give us a good young catcher and a raw 20-year old power arm.
except Salty can't catch. right?
__________________
"My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton
Jpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:29 AM   #42
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpup View Post
except Salty can't catch. right?
I went back and looked at his scouting report on Baseball America from 2006 and it says his defense was considered suspect coming out of high school but he's worked hard on his defense and it's gotten better. It also says he has a strong arm and quick release, which enabled him to thrown out 36% of the runners in 2006. It does say he still needs some work on his footwork. With time he can probably develop into an average to slightly above average catcher with a good stick.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 12:35 AM   #43
mbgrayson
Red's fan
 
mbgrayson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,933
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

From Baseball Prospectus:
Quote:
If there's something goofy, it's having to call up Teagarden already because of Jarrod Saltalamacchia's unhappy combination of a bum groin and an infection that laid him out over the break. Max Ramirez is up as well, so the Rangers have all three of their premium catching prospects up at once, with veteran Gerald Laird unavailable to provide the veteran insurance he's supposed to represent because he's still out with a sore hamstring. It makes for an interesting situation in which all of them will have had some exposure this season, and perhaps generate that much more freedom of action for Jon Daniels to entertain offers for any one of them, and that on top of the potential to swap out Laird's last two years of arbitration eligibility while those aren't especially expensive, potentially raising his value to a needy contender.
__________________
__________________
"I genuinely like this team. I like the vibe and spirit of this team. This is just the beginning." Dusty on 2/19/12.
mbgrayson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 09:02 AM   #44
RedlegJake
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 3,857
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

I'd rather the Reds call up Hanigan than acquire Laird. Trading for marginal upgrades won't help this team unless the acquisition is coupled with another trade sending Ross out for a part that can actually be of use. Laird/Hanigan would be a little better defensively and offensively than Ross/Bako. If Ross brought someone useful - even a role player - from the Fish, then Laird could make sense depending on which young pitcher he cost us. I'd rather spend more and snag Ramirez, though.
RedlegJake is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 09:27 AM   #45
corkedbat
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,951
Re: Reds one of two teams pursuing Gerald Laird

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedlegJake View Post
I'd rather the Reds call up Hanigan than acquire Laird. Trading for marginal upgrades won't help this team unless the acquisition is coupled with another trade sending Ross out for a part that can actually be of use. Laird/Hanigan would be a little better defensively and offensively than Ross/Bako. If Ross brought someone useful - even a role player - from the Fish, then Laird could make sense depending on which young pitcher he cost us. I'd rather spend more and snag Ramirez, though.
I'd want Teagarden or Ramierez for Homer
corkedbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25