![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Reds Slacker '07
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
|
Looking back to what it could of been...
I logged into my old photobucket account the other day and saw this... I just said Wow... Times sure do change in 6 years...
__________________
You think you got what it takes to play a real fantasy game? Join me at Jockstocks. You can play Baseball, Basketball, Football, Golf, Nascar and even Hockey! Jockstocks Homepage Do you have your shirt on? - Adam Dunn to Marty on the Bananna Phone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
They've both put on way too many lbs since then. I expect some weight to appear in a player's late 20s/early 30s but these guys put on 25-30 lbs before they were 25.
Kearns has really been a disappointment. I recall when they were coming up and we were enjoying Dunn, Adam said "just wait 'till Kearns gets here. He's better than me." I think he was. I don't know if it was that collision with Ray King or just a case of a guy peaking at age 24 but Kearns was supposed to be a perennial All Star. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,099
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
I really don't understand what anyone is talking about regarding Dunn being overweight. I don't see it.
I keep reading it and hearing it on call-in shows from his detractors, but I don't see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,400
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
Gosh we all should look the same as we did at 21.... did you miss the memo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,667
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
They both had BRM haircuts. That is what went wrong, they let their hair grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,686
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
2006
![]() 2008 ![]() He's slimmer now.
__________________
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures." |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,545
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
Austin Kearns is reason enough not to annoit Jay Bruce the savior of the franchise just yet.
Let Bruce develop into it....don't appoint him it.
__________________
"Strickland Propane... Taste the meat, not the heat." - Hank Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
You're being very UnDude.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
OT- i do like those helmets as opposed to the cool-flo ones they wear now. But again, I'm a geek.
__________________
Witty signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
You're soaking in it!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,335
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
I submit further evidence...Remember Brandon Larson?
__________________
"Sometimes, it's not the sexiest moves that put you over the top," Krivsky said. "It's a series of transactions that help you get there." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,419
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
We do have two openings in the outfield after this season...
Let's bring 'em back!
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
Quote:
Dunn on the other hand looked like a HOF in his early career but after the 2002 AS break he never seemed to get back to that early level. Dunn's first half of 02 was unreal; .300 BA, .452 OBP, .544 Slugging. It seemed like the league made some adjustments that Dunn has failed to make. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
Quote:
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,545
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
Quote:
__________________
"Strickland Propane... Taste the meat, not the heat." - Hank Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,660
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
I remember there being an article back in 2002 talking about Jim Bowden wanting Dunn to start pulling the ball more in order to hit for more power. I thought it was foolish at the time because Dunn was still hitting for power and was hitting up in the .310-.320 range with an OBP in the .460 area and an OPS over 1.000, yet Bowden wanted him to pull the ball more. That doesn't surprise me though considering how awful of a GM Bowden is/was. Dunn was never that same hitter after that. All those different hitting coaches didn't help matters either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: Looking back to what it could of been...
IIRC there was an article when both were still in the minors predicting future status of the top minor league players. Dunn was predicted as a future HOF and Kearns as a potental All Star and an everyday player in the bigs. It is interesting to look now 8 years later and see where each player stands.
Kearns is a fringe everyday outfielder. If he weren't playing for Jimbo he would have bounced around the league for the past year +. Dunn on the other hand, if healthy, will put up HOF HR numbers. It will be interesting to see if Dunn hits 500, 550, 600 how people will fell about him. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |