RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > Non-Sports Chatter

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-14-2008, 10:49 AM   #1
Chip R
Rally Onion!
 
Chip R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,227
Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081014/..._rolling_stone
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160
Chip R is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 10-14-2008, 10:59 AM   #2
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,403
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

The size reduction is in direct relation to the reduction of quality music articles the magazine produces these days.
westofyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:27 PM   #3
nate
High five!
 
nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,776
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
The size reduction is in direct relation to the reduction of quality music articles the magazine produces these days.
If it were, one would need an electron microscope to read it.
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!"
nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 01:48 PM   #4
MilotheMayor
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 155
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate View Post
If it were, one would need an electron microscope to read it.
:ughmamoru
MilotheMayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 02:04 PM   #5
Unassisted
RZ Chamber of Commerce
 
Unassisted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 13,228
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
The size reduction is in direct relation to the reduction of quality music articles the magazine produces these days.
I would have guessed it was due to the reduction of quality music these days.
__________________
/r/reds
Unassisted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 02:23 PM   #6
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,403
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate View Post
If it were, one would need an electron microscope to read it.
So true... I spent many an hour in high school trolling through the schools backlog of RS (yes my Cincinnati school had RS!!) of course it was not even glossy then.

Back then it was beautiful
The boys were sweet and musical
The laser lights looked mystical
Messed up stuff felt magical
Girls didn't seem so difficult
Boys didn't seem so typical
It was warm and white and wonderful
We were all invincible
westofyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 02:31 PM   #7
OldRightHander
Resident optimist
 
OldRightHander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
I would have guessed it was due to the reduction of quality music these days.
How true.
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball.

Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company
OldRightHander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 02:38 PM   #8
nate
High five!
 
nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,776
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
I would have guessed it was due to the reduction of quality music these days.
There's some interesting music and some interesting production out there.

But great songs and songwriters seem to be hot on the trail of the dodo.
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!"
nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 07:49 PM   #9
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,127
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

I'm mid-thirties now, so I'm really starting to 'not get' so much of the music that is out today....but I wonder how much of some of our lament isn't the exact sort of thing people used to lament in the 70's, the 80's, the 90's....
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 08:00 PM   #10
GAC
What Me Worry?
 
GAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,421
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations
GAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:18 PM   #11
macro
Just The Big Picture
 
macro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
I'm mid-thirties now, so I'm really starting to 'not get' so much of the music that is out today....but I wonder how much of some of our lament isn't the exact sort of thing people used to lament in the 70's, the 80's, the 90's....
Very much. It's been going on for generations, and not just with music. It happens with movies, television, great athletes, great teams, etc. Whatever was the best or most popular when we were in our teens and twenties will forever remain the best in the judgment of many/most of us.
macro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 12:56 AM   #12
Caseyfan21
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,830
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

I think Rolling Stone is in some trouble. I've been getting that magazine free for going on 3 years now and I barely read much of it other than music CD previews and the occasional story. Obviously, if they are giving that many free subscriptions away via CD's I've purchased online they must really be in need of more subscribers. It's tried to turn itself into a music/entertainment/politics magazine and it really doesn't work. I wish they would just stick to music and provide more in depth stories about musicians and music industry trends.
Caseyfan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 08:16 AM   #13
macro
Just The Big Picture
 
macro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Would Dr. Hook be as passionate today as they were in 1972?
macro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 09:33 AM   #14
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,403
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

Quote:
It's tried to turn itself into a music/entertainment/politics magazine and it really doesn't work. I wish they would just stick to music and provide more in depth stories about musicians and music industry trends.
It's always been a music/politics magazine, becoming a entertainment lifestyle magazine detracts from the the backbone of the business and makes them have to take on more competition in more avenues.

But politics and music is why most went to the magazine in the first place, not for stories on movie stars or current teenny bopper sensations.
westofyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 10:03 AM   #15
919191
Member
 
919191's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: the corner bar
Posts: 3,746
Re: Rolling Stone shrinking to regular magazine size

I worked as a cash register guy/delivery guy in a small town pharmacy in the mid 1970's. I loved RS back then, always reading it at work cover to cover.

I ordered this issue of this magazine Saturday. If I like it I'll subscribe.

__________________
I've been to dinner at Jimmy Buffet's house, and I've eaten it at a homeless shelter. And there's great joy and harrowing terror to be found in both places.
-Todd Snider
919191 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25