Originally Posted by Danny Serafini
If it's not a tie, I don't see a point in a runoff. Why make this more complicated than necessary?
Because the multitude of options is sort of blurring the results. I mean it should be fairly obvious who the next 5 best prospects are roughly speaking at least through about the top ten or 15 prospects. Perhaps we ought to better define what a prospect is. Too me it's a combination of ceiling level and how likely they are to make it to the bigs and that ceiling. One w/o the other is fairly ludicrous IMO.