![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
This is going to be ugly. I just received a message from the Bengals:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
You're a glutton for punishment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
I won't be doing a play-by-play, but after a couple possessions, I'll say this. The Bengals' defense is looking solid, and the offense looks like, well . . . it looks like they're trying. If they're going to get anywhere, it looks like it's going to be three- and four-yard dump passes at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
Quote:
![]() We're all sick, aren't we. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
Glenn Holt just caught a touchdown pass. Fitzpatrick really threaded a needle for that one.
7-0 Bengals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,441
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
Great start by Fitzpatrick. They are concentrating on quick short passes with the inexperiened OL and he is 7 for 8 passing so far and ends the drive with the 10 yard TD pass to Holt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
The Steelers have a big return and a pass for a first down to put them at the Bengals 42.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
The Steelers punt out of bounds to the Bengals' 12. Still 7-0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
The first quarter is over. The Bengals have 3rd and 3 on their 24 yard line.
Despite not having Levi Jones and Andrew Whitworth, the left side of the line is actually doing a pretty good job so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
The Bengals don't convert, and Larson shanks it out of bounds to the Steelers' 45.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
The Steelers are charged with holding on first down, and the next play, a 14 yard pass to Heath Miller is completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
Whines Hard just caught a pass that puts the Steelers at the Bengals' 13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
On fourth and one, the Steelers convert. 1st and goal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: OLine-less Bungles vs. Squealers
Touchdown Steelers, Worthlessberger to Filler.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |