RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2008, 01:16 PM   #1
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Might as well start its own thread. The BCS will probably be out around 4:30pm, though the Harris poll may be available before that. When the Harris poll comes out, we might be able to guess the BCS order since the Coaches poll has already been released:
Code:
No.	School		Record	Points	Prev
1	Alabama (57)	12-0	1520	1
2	Oklahoma (2)	11-1	1396]	2
3	Texas 		11-1	1395	4
4	Florida (1)	11-1	1384	3
5	USC 		10-1	1297	5
6	Penn State 	11-1	1175	6
7	Utah 		12-0	1152	7
8	Texas Tech (1)	11-1	1124	8
9	Boise State 	12-0	1043	9
10	Ohio State 	10-2	999	10
11	TCU 		10-2	836	14
12	Cincinnati 	10-2	770	16
13	Ball State 	12-0	765	15
14	Oregon 		9-3	658	18
15	Oklahoma State 	9-3	613	12
16	Georgia Tech 	9-3	590	23
17	Missouri 	9-3	470	11
18	Brigham Young 	10-2	461	19
19	Georgia 	9-3	440	13
20	Boston College 	9-3	435	22
21	Michigan State 	9-3	414	21
22	Northwestern 	9-3	333	20
23	Pittsburgh 	8-3	154	26
24	Oregon State 	8-4	127	17
25	Mississippi 	8-4	126	27
Texas picked up 41 points on Oklahoma this week in the Coaches poll, and with that I think they now have the inside-track to the BCS title game. Oklahoma will get a boost in the computers because of their quality win last night on the road against a ranked Oklahoma State team, but I don't think they'll get enough of a boost to offset the gains Texas picked up in the Coaches poll. FWIW, I also expect Texas to make points gains in the Harris poll too.

For the fun of it, here are my own BCS projections as of now:

BCS National Championship
Florida vs. Texas

Fiesta Bowl
Oklahoma vs. Utah

Sugar Bowl
Alabama vs. Ohio State

Orange Bowl
Cincinnati vs. Boston College

Rose Bowl
USC vs. Penn State
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-30-2008, 01:40 PM   #2
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,584
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Agree, I also think UC fans are quick to overlook VaTech. They could give Boston College as surprise this week.

Potential gate crashers
Oregon State-- if USC loses to UCLA, Oregon State clinches Pac10 Rose Bowl bid via tiebreaker. USC gets at large bid tentatively going to Ohio State or maybe Boise State.

Boise State -- Can a bowl take Boise State over Ohio State, and still hope to turn a profit? They are a sentimental choice, but the bowl committees need to sell tickets, hotels, meals, alcohol, and TV advertising.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 01:55 PM   #3
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Already it's starting in some quarters "lets have a rematch of Texas and Oklahoma" in the BCS title game.

Hey SEC winner, USC, Penn St you guys can sit on it for winning your conference, we want a rematch of a game that wasn't even that interesting the first time.

Pfft.
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 02:04 PM   #4
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,584
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by KronoRed View Post
Already it's starting in some quarters "lets have a rematch of Texas and Oklahoma" in the BCS title game.

Hey SEC winner, USC, Penn St you guys can sit on it for winning your conference, we want a rematch of a game that wasn't even that interesting the first time.

Pfft.
Agree, the precedent was set in 2006, we don't want to see it, and that 2006 OSU-Michigan game was very competitive.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 03:57 PM   #5
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Please keep Oklahoma out of the National Championship game.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 03:58 PM   #6
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Harris poll is out:

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/new...ov_30_2008.pdf

Texas goes from trailing Oklahoma by 21 points to leading Oklahoma by six points. This will be determined by the computer rankings, which last week gave Texas a decent advantage. Of course, with Texas playing a weak opponent at home and Oklahoma winning a tough road game, those will tighten up.

My prediction is Texas by a nose.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.

Last edited by Cyclone792; 11-30-2008 at 04:01 PM.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 04:08 PM   #7
Highlifeman21
Member
 
Highlifeman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
Please keep Oklahoma out of the National Championship game.
Seriously.

They are a good team offensively, but the Big 12 as a whole plays zero defense. Zero. Zip. Zilch.


Dunn went to Texas, so maybe that's where he learned his brand of defense....



... but on a more serious note, Oklahoma's lack of D would get seriously exploited by a number of teams at the top of the BCS rankings, and IMO they'd be a horrible team to play in the NC, unless they played another Big 12 team (which we don't need to see, nor should we)...
Highlifeman21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 04:36 PM   #8
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Choklahoma is #2 in the BCS. Unreal. The BCS is garbage it's completely ruining college football. It's sucking the fun completely out of college football. I hope that arrogant punk Bob Stoops and his OK team gets crushed by 20+ points. And they will, because they're Choklahoma.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 04:38 PM   #9
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Wow, so my prediction was off ... it's Oklahoma by a nose.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 04:46 PM   #10
RedsBaron
Big Red Machine
 
RedsBaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Out Wayne
Posts: 22,371
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

The BCS is a bad joke.
__________________
"Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams."
RedsBaron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 04:54 PM   #11
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

The stage is now set for the Ok/Tex rematch.

Zzzzz.
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:07 PM   #12
KronoRed
The Lineups stink.
 
KronoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Interesting stuff.

In the BCS era, teams that won their conference championship game to get to the national title game are 6-1. Teams from conferences without championship games are 4-7. Teams from conferences with championship games that got to the title game without winning their conference championship are 0-2.
__________________
Go Gators!
KronoRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:10 PM   #13
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
Boise State -- Can a bowl take Boise State over Ohio State, and still hope to turn a profit? They are a sentimental choice, but the bowl committees need to sell tickets, hotels, meals, alcohol, and TV advertising.
These games will sell out regardless of the teams involved, so ticket sales aren't really that big a concern. TV revenue is the same way -- really the only way you seriously boost TV numbers is to put a school like Notre Dame, with a truly national fanabse, into the game or a school like USC from a huge media-market. Boise State / Ohio State is almost a wash in my mind; Columbus TVs vs. Cinderella Interest balances out, IMO.

I'd be truly disappointed if the BCS snubbed Boise State, who have already delivered the best BCS game in recent memory, just to sell a few more hotel rooms.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:14 PM   #14
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

I love how Oklahoma is ranked ahead of Texas despite them having the same record and Texas beat Choklahoma by 10 points. Makes perfect sense to me. The BS = garbage.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:24 PM   #15
Cyclone792
Playoffs
 
Cyclone792's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
Re: 2008-09 BCS Discussion/Projections

Here is the full top 40:

__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012

Put an end to the Lost Decade.
Cyclone792 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25